Adaptive Filter LMS Simulator All tools
Interactive simulator

Adaptive Filter LMS Simulator

Use MSE convergence, estimated filter shape, and stability map to find fast but stable adaptation.

Parameters
Step size μ
-

Coefficient update strength.

Tap count
tap

Length of the estimated FIR filter.

Input power
-

Mean power of the reference signal.

Observation noise
dB

Noise mixed into the error signal.

Plant drift
%

Time variation of the unknown system.

Results
Misadjustment
Convergence samples
Stability margin
MSE floor
MSE convergence
Estimated filter shape
LMS stability map
Model and equations

$$w(n+1)=w(n)+\mu e(n)x(n)$$

LMS is computationally light, but too large a step size destabilizes the update. Higher input power and more taps lower the stable step-size limit.

How to read it

The MSE plot checks whether convergence is fast and non-oscillatory.

The filter view shows whether tap length can represent the unknown path.

The map shows danger when input power increases.

Learn Adaptive Filter LMS by dialogue

🙋
When reading Adaptive Filter LMS, where should I look first? Moving Step size μ changes both the plots and the result cards.
🎓
Start with Misadjustment, but do not treat the number as the whole answer. Use MSE convergence to confirm the assumed state, then read Estimated filter shape for the distribution or trend. The MSE plot checks whether convergence is fast and non-oscillatory.
🙋
I can see why Step size μ changes Misadjustment. How should I judge the influence of Tap count?
🎓
Move Tap count in small steps and watch Convergence samples. That reveals which term is controlling the result. LMS is computationally light, but too large a step size destabilizes the update. Higher input power and more taps lower the stable step-size limit. A single operating point is not enough; sweep the realistic scatter range.
🙋
What is LMS stability map for? It feels like the ordinary curve already tells the story.
🎓
LMS stability map is for finding boundaries where the condition becomes risky or margin collapses quickly. The filter view shows whether tap length can represent the unknown path. In Early design of echo or noise cancellers, the important question is often what happens after a small change, not only the nominal value.
🙋
So if Misadjustment is within the target, can I accept the condition?
🎓
Treat this as a first-pass review. It helps with Checking LMS step-size limits and Baseline comparison before NLMS or RLS, but final decisions still need standards, measured data, detailed analysis, and vendor limits. The map shows danger when input power increases.

Practical use

Early design of echo or noise cancellers.

Checking LMS step-size limits.

Baseline comparison before NLMS or RLS.

FAQ

Start with Misadjustment and Convergence samples. Then use MSE convergence to confirm the assumed state and Estimated filter shape to read distribution or bias. The MSE plot checks whether convergence is fast and non-oscillatory
Move Step size μ alone, then move Tap count by a comparable amount and compare the change in Misadjustment. LMS stability map shows combinations where margin or performance changes quickly.
Use it for Early design of echo or noise cancellers. Instead of trusting a single point, widen the input range and check whether Misadjustment keeps enough margin before moving to detailed analysis.
LMS is computationally light, but too large a step size destabilizes the update. Higher input power and more taps lower the stable step-size limit. Final decisions still require standards, measured data, detailed analysis, and vendor limits.