| # | Angle (°) | Tension (kN) | Req. Area (mm²) | Utilization (%) |
|---|
Tension: $T_i = V_i / \sin\theta_i$
Required area: $A_i = T_i / (0.6 \times f_{pu})$
where $V_i = (w+q) \cdot \Delta L_i$ is the segment vertical load
Enter span length, tower height, number of cables and loads to instantly calculate individual cable tensions and required cross-sections, visualized with a color-coded elevation.
| # | Angle (°) | Tension (kN) | Req. Area (mm²) | Utilization (%) |
|---|
The vertical force that a single cable must support comes from the weight of the deck segment it is responsible for. This segment's length depends on the total span and the number of cables.
$$V_i = (w + q) \cdot \Delta L_i$$Here, $V_i$ is the vertical load (kN) on cable *i*, $w$ is the Dead Load (kN/m), $q$ is the Live Load (kN/m), and $\Delta L_i$ is the length of the deck segment assigned to that cable.
This vertical load must be carried by the vertical component of the cable's tension. The cable's angle, determined by its attachment point and the tower height, dictates how much tension is needed to provide that vertical lift.
$$\theta_i = \arctan\left(\frac{H}{x_i}\right) \quad \text{and}\quad T_i = \frac{V_i}{\sin\theta_i}$$$\theta_i$ is the cable's angle, $H$ is the Tower Height (m), $x_i$ is the horizontal distance from the tower. $T_i$ is the total tension (kN) in the cable. The $\sin\theta_i$ term shows why a steeper angle (larger $\sin\theta$) requires less tension $T$ to carry the same load $V$.
Finally, we determine the physical size of the cable needed to safely carry that tension without breaking, based on the material's strength.
$$A_i = \frac{T_i}{0.6 \times f_{pu}}$$$A_i$ is the required cross-sectional area (mm²) of the cable, $T_i$ is the tension (kN), and $f_{pu}$ is the tensile strength (MPa) of the steel strands. The factor 0.6 is a common safety/utility factor, ensuring the working stress is well below the material's ultimate strength.
Long-Span Bridge Design: This exact calculation is the first step in designing iconic bridges like the Russky Bridge in Vladivostok. Engineers use it to optimize the number of cables and tower height to achieve spans over 1000 meters, balancing material costs with structural performance.
Construction Sequencing & Tuning: During construction, cables are tensioned in a specific order. The calculated tensions guide the "jacking" process to ensure the deck reaches its correct final geometry without overstressing any component. Post-construction, tension measurements are compared to these design values for safety checks.
Cable Material Specification: The required area $A_i$ directly informs procurement. It determines whether to use a bundle of, for example, 31 or 73 steel strands, each 15.7 mm in diameter. This calculation locks in a major cost driver for the entire project.
Retrofit & Strengthening Analysis: For existing bridges needing to carry heavier modern traffic (increased live load q), engineers re-run this analysis. It shows if current cables are sufficient or if additional cables are needed, which is often more feasible than replacing the entire bridge deck.
There are several key points you should be especially mindful of when starting to use this tool. First is the fundamental principle that cable tensions are not uniform. Cables closer to the center of the bridge have a steeper angle and lower tension, while those towards the ends have a gentler angle and higher tension. For instance, with a main span of 300m and a tower height of 60m, it's not uncommon for the tension in the end cable to be more than double that of the central cable. Misinterpreting this as "roughly the same" can lead to dangerous designs.
Next, consider the realism of live load settings. The tool assumes a uniform load "q", but in reality, you must account for concentrated or unbalanced loads. An example is the case of heavy trucks concentrated on a specific section. The tool's results are strictly a "first approximation". For actual design, more detailed load cases need to be examined separately.
Finally, note that tower height is not simply "the higher, the better". While increasing height makes the cable angle steeper and reduces tension, it also increases the material cost of the tower itself and complicates wind effects (wind loads) and seismic behavior. There are also constraints like aesthetics and navigation clearances. Before you get excited about "tension dropping!" by setting H to an extreme value in the tool, it's important to adopt a mindset of seeking an optimal solution within a realistic height range (e.g., approximately 1/5 to 1/4 of the main span).
For a cable-stayed bridge with main span L=600 m, pylon height H=280 m, 16 cable pairs, and combined design load of 85 kN/m: assume 7×19 wire rope (E=160 GPa, fpu=1770 MPa). Radial cable spacing produces maximum tension ≈4200 kN in the shortest back-stay cables near the pylon anchorage. With 48 cables (3 diameters: 80, 70, 60 mm), total cable weight ≈850 t. Mid-span vertical deflection under full load ≈185 mm, well within L/3000 serviceability limits.