| Configuration | D (N·m) | Weight (kg/m²) | Spec. Stiffness | Deflection (mm) |
|---|
$$D = \frac{E_f t_f d^2}{2}+ \frac{E_c t_c^3}{12}$$
$d = t_c + t_f$ (face centroid distance)
Simply-supported max deflection:
$$\delta = \frac{5 q L^4}{384 D}$$
Select face sheet (CFRP, aluminum, steel) and core (honeycomb, foam, balsa) materials, adjust thicknesses, and instantly compute flexural stiffness D, specific stiffness D/m, weight per m², and maximum deflection — with comparison to an equal-weight solid plate.
| Configuration | D (N·m) | Weight (kg/m²) | Spec. Stiffness | Deflection (mm) |
|---|
$$D = \frac{E_f t_f d^2}{2}+ \frac{E_c t_c^3}{12}$$
$d = t_c + t_f$ (face centroid distance)
Simply-supported max deflection:
$$\delta = \frac{5 q L^4}{384 D}$$
The core idea is that the thin, stiff face sheets carry almost all of the bending moment, while the thick, lightweight core mainly keeps them apart. The total flexural rigidity (D) combines the contribution from the faces and a small contribution from the core itself.
$$D = \frac{E_f t_f d^2}{2}+ \frac{E_c t_c^3}{12}$$$D$: Flexural Rigidity (N·m²) – The panel's bending stiffness.
$E_f$, $E_c$: Young's Modulus of face and core material (Pa).
$t_f$, $t_c$: Thickness of face sheet and core (m).
$d$ : Distance between the centroids of the two face sheets, $d = t_c + t_f$ (m).
Note: The term with $d^2$ is usually dominant. Doubling $t_c$ roughly doubles $d$, which quadruples this term.
For a simply-supported panel under a uniformly distributed load (like a shelf holding weight), the maximum deflection at the center is calculated using this standard beam formula, where the panel's unique stiffness (D) is used.
$$\delta_{max}= \frac{5 q L^4}{384 D}$$$\delta_{max}$: Maximum deflection at the panel's center (m).
$q$: Distributed load per unit width (N/m).
$L$: Span length between supports (m).
This shows why stiffness (D) is so critical: deflection is inversely proportional to D. A small increase in D leads to a proportional decrease in sag.
Aerospace Structures: Aircraft floors, wing panels, and satellite bodies use carbon fiber faces with aluminum honeycomb cores. The high specific stiffness (D per unit mass) is crucial for fuel efficiency and payload capacity. Engineers use these exact calculations to meet strict deflection limits under aerodynamic loads.
Marine & Transportation: High-speed boat hulls, train interior panels, and semi-trailer walls are built as sandwich panels. They provide the necessary rigidity to handle water pressure or cargo loads while being light enough to improve speed and reduce energy consumption.
Architecture & Construction: Modern building facades, cleanroom walls, and raised access floors often use panels with metal or composite faces and a mineral wool or foam core. They provide thermal insulation, fire resistance, and sufficient stiffness to span between supports without visible sagging.
Consumer & Sports Goods: Snowboards, skis, surfboards, and even high-end doors utilize the sandwich principle. A wood or foam core with fiberglass or carbon fiber faces creates a product that is lightweight, torsionally stiff, and responsive—directly dependent on the calculated flexural rigidity.
First, the idea that "a core just needs to be lightweight" is risky. While weight reduction is certainly important, if the core's shear rigidity is too low, the "maximum deflection δ" calculated by the tool can be significantly underestimated compared to reality. For example, for a 2m long panel under a 1kN/m load, a combination of CFRP facesheets and balsa core might show a small calculated deflection, but the actual panel can deflect noticeably with a "soft" feel due to shear deformation in the core. In practical design, more detailed calculations considering shear deformation or FEM analysis are essential.
Next, do not treat the bonding of the facesheets and core as a "black box". This calculation tool assumes a perfectly monolithic structure, but in practice, delamination of the adhesive layer is a critical failure mode. For instance, in panels used in high-temperature, high-humidity environments, the significant difference in thermal expansion coefficients between the facesheet (e.g., aluminum) and the core (e.g., foam) can cause stress concentration at the adhesive interface under cyclic loading. Even if calculations show excellent performance, adhesive selection and application quality are lifelines for the design.
Finally, note that "highest specific stiffness does not always mean the optimal solution". While CFRP/aluminum honeycomb wins overwhelmingly in specific stiffness, its cost can be tens of times higher. For example, in industrial machine covers, an aluminum/foam combination often provides sufficient stiffness and overall superiority in terms of manufacturability and cost. After comparing performance with the tool, always make your final judgment by considering constraints like cost, manufacturing methods, and environmental resistance.
Glass-fiber face sheets (E=10 GPa, t=2 mm each) bonded to PVC foam core (E=15 MPa, t=40 mm), panel length L=1.5 m, distributed load q=2.5 kN/m. Result: D≈450 N·m (moment of inertia-weighted stiffness), maximum deflection δ≈8.2 mm at midspan, weight 4.8 kg/m², f₁≈12.4 Hz. Increasing core to 60 mm raises D to 890 N·m and reduces deflection to 4.1 mm.