\(r_p = r\left[\frac{2(p_0\sin\phi + c\cos\phi)}{(1-\sin\phi)(p_i + c\cot\phi)}\right]^{\frac{1}{2k}}\)
Ground Reaction Curve (GRC):
\(p_{wall}= p_0 - \frac{c\cos\phi + p_0\sin\phi}{1-\sin\phi}\left[1-\left(\frac{r_p}{r}\right)^{-2}\right]\)
Real-time plotting of the ground reaction curve (GRC) and support characteristic curve (SCC) using Mohr-Coulomb elasto-plastic theory. Instantly computes plastic zone radius, convergence displacement, and support utilization ratio.
The core of the analysis is determining the extent of the yielded ground around the tunnel, defined by the plastic zone radius. This is calculated using the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion for a thick-walled cylinder under initial in-situ stress.
$$r_p = r \left[\frac{2(p_0\sin\phi + c\cos\phi)}{(1-\sin\phi)(p_i + c\cot\phi)}\right]^{\frac{1}{2k}}$$Where:
\(r_p\) = Radius of the plastic zone [m]
\(r\) = Tunnel excavation radius [m]
\(p_0\) = Initial in-situ stress [kPa]
\(p_i\) = Internal support pressure at the tunnel wall [kPa]
\(c\) = Cohesion of the ground [kPa]
\(\phi\) = Friction angle of the ground [°]
\(k\) = A constant, \(k = \frac{\sin\phi}{1-\sin\phi}\)
The equation shows that increasing the support pressure \(p_i\) directly reduces the plastic zone size \(r_p\).
The Ground Reaction Curve (GRC) defines the relationship between the support pressure \(p_i\) and the radial displacement of the tunnel wall \(u_r\). It has two parts: an elastic portion (before yielding) and a plastic portion (after yielding begins).
$$p_{wall}= p_0 - \frac{c\cos\phi + p_0\sin\phi}{1-\sin\phi}\left[1 - \left(\frac{r}{r_p}\right)^{2k}\right]$$This is the simplified form of the GRC equation in the plastic region. The wall pressure \(p_{wall}\) is equal to the internal support pressure \(p_i\) at equilibrium. The term \((r/r_p)^{2k}\) captures the influence of the plastic zone size. As displacement increases (\(r_p\) grows), the ground's resisting pressure \(p_{wall}\) decreases along the curve, which is why timely support installation is crucial in NATM.
Urban Metro Tunneling: In cities, tunnels must be built close to existing foundations with minimal surface settlement. Engineers use this GRC-SCC analysis to determine the optimal stiffness and timing for shotcrete lining. For instance, a stiffer, early-installed lining (moved earlier on the GRC) minimizes plastic zone growth and protects nearby buildings.
Mine Access and Haulage Drifts: In mining, tunnels are often in weak, fractured rock. The analysis helps decide between light, yielding supports (like split-sets) or heavy, rigid supports (like concrete liners). A common case is designing for a specific "yield" displacement to activate ground arching without causing collapse.
High-Speed Rail Tunnels in Mountains: These long tunnels encounter varying rock masses. The interactive model helps engineers design a flexible support system that can be adapted zone-by-zone. For example, in a fault zone with low cohesion, the graph shows a much larger plastic zone, requiring a stronger, more ductile SCC.
Hydropower Pressure Tunnels: Tunnels carrying high-pressure water must resist internal bursting forces and external ground loads. The GRC-SCC intersection analysis ensures the final concrete lining is designed for the long-term ground pressure that develops after the initial rock bolts and shotcrete have deformed.
When you start using this tool, there are a few common pitfalls to watch out for. The first one is whether you are simply setting the initial in-situ stress p0 as the overburden pressure. While it's common to calculate p0 = γH (γ: unit weight of soil, H: overburden), in actual mountain tunnels, the lateral pressure coefficient (the ratio of horizontal to vertical stress) is rarely 1. For example, in folded zones, horizontal stress can be 1.5 times or more the vertical stress. The tool requires you to input p0 as a single value, but that value needs to be an appropriate estimate that considers the influence of such geological structures.
The second point is using the tool without understanding parameter sensitivity. Particularly, the "cohesion c" and "friction angle φ" are sensitive parameters where small changes can significantly alter the results. For instance, ground with c=100 kPa, φ=30 degrees and ground with c=80 kPa, φ=28 degrees might appear similar, but the final convergence displacement without support can differ by more than a factor of two. Since survey data has variability, you should always perform a "sensitivity analysis" by gradually changing parameters to see how the curves shift. This is the first step in risk assessment.
Finally, don't forget that this analysis is based on the idealizations of a "circular cross-section" and "isotropic, homogeneous ground." Actual cross-sections are horseshoe-shaped, and ground is often layered or full of fractures. Therefore, the plastic zone radius and wall support pressure calculated here are "guidelines," not "absolute values." By comparing them with field measurement data and empirically accumulating correction factors—like "for this ground condition, displacement tends to be 1.2 times the calculated value"—you build true design capability.
6 m diameter tunnel in silty clay: r=6 m, p0=180 kPa (9 m depth), c=25 kPa, φ=28°. Mohr-Coulomb analysis yields GRC peak support demand ~120 kPa at 2.5% wall convergence. 200 mm shotcrete (25 GPa modulus) with 2×2 m bolt grid provides support curve intersecting GRC at 1.8% convergence (radial displacement δ ≈ 108 mm). Equilibrium achieved without face instability or excessive deformation.