Underwater Acoustic Analysis
Theory: sound speed and attenuation in the sea
Overview
I've heard sound travels much farther underwater than in air. Why?
Water quickly absorbs light and radio waves but hardly absorbs sound, especially at low frequency, so sound is how information travels far underwater. Sound weakens by spreading out and by absorption, and absorption grows roughly with frequency squared, so lower tones reach farther. Sea sound speed also varies with temperature, salinity and depth, and sound bends toward slower regions. Around 1,000 m depth lies a minimum-speed layer where trapped sound can travel thousands of kilometres. Underwater acoustic analysis includes this speed profile and absorption to calculate where and how strongly sound arrives.
Sound-speed formula (Medwin)
T is temperature (°C), S practical salinity and z depth (m).
Absorption and transmission loss (Thorp)
The first is Thorp's absorption coefficient (an approximation up to tens of kHz). Transmission loss sums spherical spreading and absorption; in shallow water spreading becomes cylindrical (10 dB per tenfold distance) beyond some range.
The Titanic and sonar
The 1912 sinking of the Titanic spurred research on detecting icebergs by sound, and during the First World War Langevin built ultrasonic transducers with quartz piezoelectric elements. In the Second World War it emerged that sound-speed profiles bend sound, letting submarines hide in acoustic shadow zones, which advanced ocean sound-speed research. In the deep minimum-speed layer (the SOFAR channel), small explosions were heard thousands of kilometres away.
Worked examples
Example 1: sound speed by temperature and depth (salinity 35)
| Temperature | Surface | 1,000 m depth |
|---|---|---|
| 5 ℃ | 1,470.9 m/s | 1,486.9 m/s |
| 15 ℃ | 1,506.8 m/s | 1,522.8 m/s |
| 25 ℃ | 1,534.4 m/s | 1,550.4 m/s |
Fresh water (salinity 0) at 15 °C gives 1,465.2 m/s. In the real ocean temperature falls with depth, so sound speed reaches a minimum at some depth.
Example 2: transmission loss by frequency and range (spherical spreading + absorption)
| Frequency | Wavelength | Absorption | 1 km | 10 km | 50 km |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 kHz | 1.5 m | 0.069 dB/km | 60 dB | 81 dB | 97 dB |
| 10 kHz | 0.15 m | 1.19 dB/km | 61 dB | 92 dB | 153 dB |
| 50 kHz | 0.03 m | 17.5 dB/km | 77 dB | (out of practical range) | (out of practical range) |
Treating spreading as cylindrical beyond 1 km in shallow water, loss at 10 km is 71 dB at 1 kHz and 82 dB at 10 kHz.
Up to 1 km frequency matters little, but farther out high frequencies lose badly.
Spreading loss is frequency-independent and grows with the logarithm of range, while absorption grows in proportion to range with a coefficient that varies greatly with frequency. Nearby, spreading dominates and frequency matters little; farther out absorption takes over. Absorption at 10 kHz is 1.2 dB at 1 km but nearly 60 dB at 50 km. High frequencies resolve small objects with short wavelengths and allow compact equipment, but don't reach far, so sonar frequency is chosen from target range and the size to resolve. In the real ocean, speed profiles bend sound into shadow zones and the surface and seabed reflect it, so propagation is computed with ray methods or parabolic equations.
Analysis workflow
- Build a sound-speed profile from temperature, salinity and depth data.
- Choose ray, normal-mode or parabolic-equation methods from frequency and range.
- Include surface and seabed reflection, absorption and seabed geology.
- Near transducers, solve structure–acoustic coupling (elements, domes) with FEM.
- Calibrate seabed properties against measured transmission loss.
“Sound that stopped arriving in summer”
An underwater communication link in a bay worked reliably over several kilometres in winter but dropped out at the same range in summer. Summer warming of surface water created a layer cooling with depth, so sound speed also fell with depth. Sound bent downward toward slower water, and the near-surface receiver fell into an acoustic shadow. Ray calculations reproduced the shadow, and moving the receiver deeper stabilised the link.
Common mistakes
Mistakes and fixes
| Mistake | Effect | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Constant sound speed | Shadow zones missed | Use the depth profile |
| Frequency-independent absorption | High-frequency range overestimated | Absorption per frequency |
| Spherical spreading in shallow water | Far-field loss overestimated | Cylindrical or modal |
| Ignoring seasons | Summer dropouts | Compute per season |
| Perfectly reflecting seabed | Loss underestimated | Model seabed geology |
I'd like to learn related topics.
Related pages include vibroacoustic coupled analysis, acoustic–structure interaction, Lighthill's acoustic analogy, noise prediction and duct acoustics.
Related Topics
Experience the theory firsthand with the interactive simulator for this field
All Simulators