Diffusion Flames and Mixture Fraction

Category: Fluid Analysis (CFD) | Integrated 2026-04-06
CAE visualization for diffusion flame theory - technical simulation diagram
Diffusion Flames and Mixture Fraction

Diffusion Flames and Mixture Fraction: Theoretical Foundations

Overview

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

Professor, what kind of combustion mode is a diffusion flame?


๐ŸŽ“

A diffusion flame (non-premixed flame) is a mode where fuel and oxidizer are supplied separately, and combustion proceeds simultaneously with mixing. Examples include candle flames, diesel engines, and gas turbine combustors. The flame forms at the surface where fuel and oxidizer meet at the stoichiometric ratio (stoichiometric surface).


๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

So it's fundamentally different from a premixed flame.


๐ŸŽ“

Correct. In premixed flames, the burning velocity is the governing parameter, but in diffusion flames, the mixing rate becomes the rate-limiting step. Utilizing this property, describing the flame structure with the variable mixture fraction $Z$ is the core of the Burke-Schumann theory.


Mixture Fraction

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

Please explain the definition of mixture fraction $Z$.


๐ŸŽ“

Mixture fraction is a conserved scalar representing "how much mass from the fuel stream is contained within a fluid element." Bilger's definition is widely used.


$$ Z = \frac{s\,Y_F - Y_O + Y_{O,2}}{s\,Y_{F,1} + Y_{O,2}} $$

Here, $Y_F$ is the fuel mass fraction, $Y_O$ is the oxidizer mass fraction, subscript 1 indicates values from the fuel stream, and subscript 2 indicates values from the oxidizer stream. $s$ is the mass-based stoichiometric ratio.


๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

So $Z=0$ is pure oxidizer and $Z=1$ is pure fuel?


๐ŸŽ“

Exactly. The stoichiometric mixture fraction $Z_{st}$ is $Z_{st} = Y_{O,2}/(s\,Y_{F,1} + Y_{O,2})$. For methane/air, $Z_{st} \approx 0.055$. The flame is located at the iso-surface where $Z = Z_{st}$.


Burke-Schumann Solution

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

What is the Burke-Schumann solution?


๐ŸŽ“

Assuming the chemical reaction is infinitely fast ($Da \to \infty$), fuel and oxidizer react instantaneously at the flame surface, and temperature and chemical species become functions of mixture fraction only.


$$ T = T(Z), \quad Y_i = Y_i(Z) $$

This is the Burke-Schumann solution, where the temperature profile becomes triangular, peaking at $Z_{st}$. This solution is also the starting point for the flamelet model.


Mixture Fraction Transport Equation

๐ŸŽ“

Mixture fraction $Z$ obeys a transport equation without a source term (independent of chemical reaction).


$$ \frac{\partial(\rho Z)}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot(\rho\mathbf{u}Z) = \nabla\cdot\left(\rho D \nabla Z\right) $$

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

Since there's no source term, we can solve for the $Z$ field without knowing the details of the chemical reaction, right?


๐ŸŽ“

That's the major advantage of the mixture fraction approach. It encapsulates the complexity of chemical reactions into the flamelet equations in $Z$ space, and in CFD, we only need to transport $Z$ and its variance $\widetilde{Z''^2}$.


๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

So the theory of diffusion flames is entirely based on the concept of mixture fraction.


๐ŸŽ“

Yes. It's no exaggeration to say that mixture fraction is the most important variable in CFD for non-premixed combustion.


Coffee Break Yomoyama Talk

The Candle Flame Was the "Textbook" Diffusion Flameโ€”The Limits of the Burke-Schumann Solution

The analytical solution for diffusion flames proposed by Burke and Schumann in 1928 is based on the "infinite reaction rate" assumption that mixing of fuel and oxidizer completes instantaneously. A candle flame can be reproduced surprisingly well with this model. However, when the same assumption is used in actual gas turbine combustors, the predicted NOx generation can be over ten times the measured value. Even though mixing should be rate-limiting when mixing is slow, the finite reaction rate becomes apparent in high-temperature regions. This is why field engineers say, "The Burke-Schumann solution is excellent for conceptual understanding, but cannot be used for design."

Computational Methods for Diffusion Flames and Mixture Fraction

Details of Numerical Methods

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

How is a mixture fraction-based combustion model implemented in CFD?


๐ŸŽ“

In non-premixed combustion models, the transport equations for $Z$ and $\widetilde{Z''^2}$ (mixture fraction variance) are solved in CFD, and chemical reaction information is retrieved from a lookup table.


Transport Equations

๐ŸŽ“

The equations for Favre-averaged mixture fraction $\widetilde{Z}$ and variance $\widetilde{Z''^2}$ in a turbulent field are as follows.


$$ \frac{\partial(\bar{\rho}\widetilde{Z})}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot(\bar{\rho}\widetilde{\mathbf{u}}\widetilde{Z}) = \nabla\cdot\left(\frac{\mu_t}{Sc_t}\nabla\widetilde{Z}\right) $$

$$ \frac{\partial(\bar{\rho}\widetilde{Z''^2})}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot(\bar{\rho}\widetilde{\mathbf{u}}\widetilde{Z''^2}) = \nabla\cdot\left(\frac{\mu_t}{Sc_t}\nabla\widetilde{Z''^2}\right) + 2\frac{\mu_t}{Sc_t}|\nabla\widetilde{Z}|^2 - \bar{\rho}\widetilde{\chi} $$

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

What is the last term $\widetilde{\chi}$ in the variance equation?


๐ŸŽ“

That's the scalar dissipation rate. It is defined as $\chi = 2D|\nabla Z|^2$ and represents how quickly the fine structure of the mixture fraction dissipates. Under turbulent conditions, it is modeled as $\widetilde{\chi} = C_\chi \frac{\varepsilon}{k}\widetilde{Z''^2}$ (where $C_\chi \approx 2.0$).


PDF (Probability Density Function)

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

Please explain the role of the PDF.


๐ŸŽ“

In a turbulent field, $Z$ fluctuates within a cell, so the average value alone cannot correctly represent the flame structure. We assume a probability density function $P(Z)$ for $Z$ and calculate the average temperature and average chemical species through integration.


$$ \widetilde{T} = \int_0^1 T(Z)\,\widetilde{P}(Z)\,dZ $$

๐ŸŽ“

The $\beta$ function distribution is widely used for the PDF shape. The shape of the $\beta$ distribution is uniquely determined from the two parameters $\widetilde{Z}$ and $\widetilde{Z''^2}$.


Lookup Table Construction

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

How is the table created?


๐ŸŽ“

We solve the flamelet equations or chemical equilibrium beforehand to create a table of temperature and chemical species with $Z$ and $\chi_{st}$ (stoichiometric dissipation rate) as parameters. The table integrated with the PDF is referenced during CFD runtime.


Table VariableDimensionsPurpose
$\widetilde{Z}$, $\widetilde{Z''^2}$2DEquilibrium chemistry / thin flames
$\widetilde{Z}$, $\widetilde{Z''^2}$, $\widetilde{\chi_{st}}$3DSteady flamelet
$\widetilde{Z}$, $\widetilde{Z''^2}$, $\widetilde{C}$3DFGM (with progress variable added)
๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

How is it set up in Fluent?


๐ŸŽ“

In Fluent, select Models > Species > Non-Premixed Combustion, import the reaction mechanism in CHEMKIN format, and let it automatically generate the PDF table. A table resolution (number of divisions in the $Z$ direction) of at least 64 points, preferably 128 points, is recommended.


๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

The mixture fraction + PDF table method is clever because it solves the chemical reactions beforehand.


๐ŸŽ“

Yes. The biggest strength is that there's no need to solve chemical reactions during 3D CFD runtime, so computational cost remains almost unchanged even with detailed chemical reactions.


Coffee Break Yomoyama Talk

How to Solve for Scalar Dissipation Rate ฯ‡โ€”The Most Debated Variable in Diffusion Flame Model Implementation

When implementing a flamelet model for diffusion flames, the variable that troubles implementers the most is the calculation of the scalar dissipation rate ฯ‡ (chi). ฯ‡ represents the intensity of mixing at the flame surface (the stretching rate of fuel-oxidizer due to turbulence), and higher ฯ‡ makes the flame more prone to extinction. However, there are multiple formulas for directly calculating ฯ‡ in turbulent CFD, and results vary depending on the choice of Favre averaging and model constants. Especially in regions where recirculation zones (burner wake) coexist with areas of low ฯ‡ near zero and high ฯ‡ in shear layers, the accuracy of spatial distribution calculation directly affects NOx and soot predictions. "How to calculate ฯ‡" often becomes a vendor's secret sauce.

Related Simulators

Experience the theory firsthand with the interactive simulator for this field

All Simulators

Related fields

Thermal AnalysisV&V ยท Quality AssuranceStructural Analysis
Rate this article
Thank you for your feedback!
Helpful
More details
Report error
Helpful
0
More details
0
Report error
0
Written by NovaSolver Contributors
Anonymous Engineers & AI โ€” Sitemap
About the Authors