Isotropic Hardening Model

Category: Structural Analysis | Integrated 2026-04-06
CAE visualization for isotropic hardening theory - technical simulation diagram
Isotropic hardening model

Isotropic Hardening: Theoretical Foundations

What is Isotropic Hardening?

🧑‍🎓

Professor, what is isotropic hardening?


🎓

Isotropic hardening (isotropic hardening) is a model where the yield surface expands uniformly during plastic deformation. The yield stress increases with the accumulation of plastic strain.


$$ \sigma_Y = \sigma_{Y0} + H \varepsilon_p $$

$H$ is the hardening coefficient. Arbitrary hardening curves can be defined using a table format (correspondence table of stress vs. plastic strain).


Characteristics

🎓
  • Accurate for monotonic loading — Tension → tension (repetition in the same direction)
  • Inaccurate for cyclic loading — Tension → compression (cannot represent the Bauschinger effect)
  • Default for all solvers — The simplest hardening model

  • 🧑‍🎓

    What is the Bauschinger effect?


    🎓

    The phenomenon where, after plastic deformation in tension, the yield stress in the compression direction decreases. Since isotropic hardening expands the yield stress to the same value for both tension and compression, it cannot represent this effect. For cyclic loading (fatigue), kinematic hardening (kinematic hardening) is necessary.


    Setting in FEM

    🎓
    • Abaqus: *PLASTIC (default is isotropic hardening)
    • Nastran: MATS1, TYPE=PLASTIC
    • Ansys: TB, BISO or TB, MISO
    • LS-DYNA: *MAT_24 (isotropic hardening is default)

    • Summary

      🎓

      Key points:


      • Yield surface expands uniformly — Same yield stress in all directions
      • Optimal for monotonic loading — Use kinematic hardening for cyclic loading
      • Cannot represent Bauschinger effect — Same yield stress for tension → compression
      • Default for all solvers — The simplest

      Coffee Break Casual Talk

      Yield Surface Expansion in Isotropic Hardening

      In the isotropic hardening rule, the yield surface expands isotropically with plastic deformation, while its center position remains unchanged. The yield stress σy(εₚ) is updated with the accumulated plastic strain εₚ. Since Prandtl formulated the plastic flow rule in 1934, it has been used for over 90 years as the simplest choice for monotonic loading problems.

      Computational Methods for Isotropic Hardening

      Numerical Processing of Isotropic Hardening

      🎓

      Processed with the Return Mapping algorithm. Elastic predictor → yield check → radial return. Same as von Mises plasticity.


      Table Input

      🎓

      ```

      *PLASTIC

      250., 0.0

      300., 0.02

      400., 0.1

      450., 0.2

      ```

      Correspondence table of true stress vs. true plastic strain. Intermediate values are linearly interpolated.


      Summary

      🎓
      • Return Mapping + radial return — Standard for von Mises + isotropic hardening
      • Table input — True stress vs. true plastic strain
      • Linear interpolation — Automatic interpolation between table points

      • Coffee Break Casual Talk

        Hardening Curve Input Format

        Many solvers accept isotropic hardening in a table format of "true stress vs. accumulated plastic strain". In Abaqus, up to 200 points can be input on the *PLASTIC card. In practice, the basic procedure is to convert engineering stress-strain from tensile tests using σ_true=σ_eng(1+ε_eng), ε_true=ln(1+ε_eng), and then subtract elastic strain to obtain εₚ.

        Isotropic Hardening in Practice

        Isotropic Hardening in Practice

        🎓

        Most widely used for monotonic loading of metals (tensile tests, forming, pressure tests).


        Practical Checklist

        🎓
        • [ ] Is the stress-plastic strain data true values (not nominal)?
        • [ ] Does the table's maximum strain cover the analysis's maximum strain?
        • [ ] For cyclic loading, has kinematic hardening been considered?
        • [ ] Is temperature dependence of yield stress needed (high-temperature problems)?

        • Coffee Break Casual Talk

          Staple for Press Forming Analysis

          In stamping analysis for automotive body panels, combining the isotropic hardening rule with the Swift equation (σ=Cεₙ) has been a standard method since the 1980s. Representative values for high-strength steel DP980 are C≈1600MPa, n≈0.12. Prediction accuracy for thickness reduction rate generally deviates from experimental values by 3-5%, making it widely used for initial die design studies.

          Isotropic Hardening: Software & Solver Comparison

          Tools for Isotropic Hardening

          🎓

          Standard in all solvers. Only the setup method differs.


          SolverSetting
          Abaqus*PLASTIC table
          NastranMATS1 + TABLES1
          AnsysTB, BISO (bilinear) or TB, MISO (multilinear)
          LS-DYNA*MAT_24
          Coffee Break Casual Talk

          Solver-Agnostic Implementation

          While the physical model is identical across solvers, the input card format differs significantly. Abaqus uses a straightforward table format, Nastran requires linking separate TABLES1 cards, and Ansys distinguishes between bilinear (BISO) and multilinear (MISO) options. LS-DYNA's *MAT_24 is optimized for explicit dynamics and handles strain rate effects differently. Understanding these differences is critical for CAE workflows involving multiple software platforms.

          Related Simulators

          Experience the theory through interactive simulators in this field

          All Simulators

          Related fields

          Thermal AnalysisManufacturing Process AnalysisV&V · Quality Assurance
          Rate this article
          Thank you for your feedback!
          Helpful
          More details
          Report error
          Helpful
          0
          More details
          0
          Report error
          0
          Written by NovaSolver Contributors
          Anonymous Engineers & AI — Sitemap
          About the Authors