Johnson-Cook Constitutive Model

Category: Structural Analysis | Integrated 2026-04-06
CAE visualization for johnson cook theory - technical simulation diagram
Johnson-Cook Constitutive Model

Johnson-Cook Constitutive Model: Theoretical Foundations

What is the Johnson-Cook Constitutive Law?

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

Professor, what is the Johnson-Cook constitutive law?


๐ŸŽ“

The Johnson-Cook (JC) model (1983) is a strain rate and temperature dependent elastoplastic + ductile damage model. It is the most widely used model for metal deformation and fracture under impact and collision.


Constitutive Equation

๐ŸŽ“

Flow stress:


$$ \sigma = (A + B\varepsilon_p^n)(1 + C\ln\dot{\varepsilon}^*)(1 - T^{*m}) $$

  • $A$ โ€” Yield Stress
  • $B, n$ โ€” Strain hardening coefficient and exponent
  • $C$ โ€” Strain rate sensitivity
  • $m$ โ€” Thermal softening exponent
  • $\dot{\varepsilon}^* = \dot{\varepsilon}/\dot{\varepsilon}_0$ โ€” Dimensionless strain rate
  • $T^* = (T-T_{room})/(T_{melt}-T_{room})$ โ€” Homologous temperature (dimensionless)

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

It's the multiplication of three factors (hardening ร— rate ร— temperature)!


๐ŸŽ“

Simple yet practical. It can describe high-speed metal deformation over a wide range using just five parameters ($A, B, n, C, m$). JC parameters for many metals are reported in the literature.


JC Failure Criterion

๐ŸŽ“

Equivalent plastic strain at ductile fracture:


$$ \varepsilon_f = (D_1 + D_2 e^{D_3 \eta})(1 + D_4 \ln\dot{\varepsilon}^*)(1 + D_5 T^*) $$

$\eta = \sigma_m / \sigma_{vm}$ is the stress triaxiality. $D_1 \sim D_5$ are the fracture parameters.


๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

The fracture strain changes with stress triaxiality $\eta$. It behaves more brittle under tension ($\eta > 0$) and more ductile under shear ($\eta \approx 0$).


Summary

๐ŸŽ“

Key Points:


  • $\sigma = (A+B\varepsilon^n)(1+C\ln\dot{\varepsilon}^)(1-T^{m})$ โ€” Hardening ร— Rate ร— Temperature
  • Five material constants โ€” Literature values available for many metals
  • JC failure criterion โ€” Stress triaxiality dependent ductile fracture
  • Standard model for impact/collision analysis โ€” LS-DYNA MAT_15, Abaqus PLASTIC+DAMAGE

Coffee Break Trivia

Year of JC Model Proposal

This model, proposed by Gordon Johnson and William Cook in 1983, expresses stress as a multiplicative form of plastic strain, strain rate, and temperature. Originally developed to organize U.S. Army ballistic penetration test data, its adoption as a standard material model for high-speed deformation analysis spread within two years of the paper's publication.

Computational Methods for the Johnson-Cook Constitutive Model

LS-DYNA

```

*MAT_JOHNSON_COOK

$ A, B, n, C, m, Tmelt, Troom, eps0

350., 275., 0.36, 0.022, 1.0, 1793., 293., 1.0

```

Abaqus

```

*PLASTIC, HARDENING=JOHNSON COOK

A, B, n, m, Tmelt, Troom

*RATE DEPENDENT, TYPE=JOHNSON COOK

C, eps0

*DAMAGE INITIATION, CRITERION=JOHNSON COOK

D1, D2, D3, D4, D5, Tmelt, Troom

*DAMAGE EVOLUTION, TYPE=DISPLACEMENT

u_f

```

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

So in Abaqus, plasticity + rate dependence + damage are set with three separate definitions.


๐ŸŽ“

LS-DYNA uses a single *MAT card for everything. Abaqus defines them separately, offering flexibility but requiring more settings.


Summary

๐ŸŽ“
  • LS-DYNA *MAT_JOHNSON_COOK โ€” All parameters in one card
  • Abaqus PLASTIC JC + RATE DEPENDENT + *DAMAGE โ€” Separate definitions
  • Temperature rise under adiabatic conditions โ†’ Activates the JC thermal softening term

  • Coffee Break Trivia

    Identification Experiments for the 5 Parameters

    The five Johnson-Cook constants (A, B, n, C, m) are identified stepwise. First, A, B, n are determined from quasi-static tests, then C from Split Hopkinson Bar tests (strain rates 10ยฒโ€“10โด/s), and m from heating tests. Representative values for Al6061-T6, widely cited, are A=276MPa, B=406MPa, n=0.51, C=0.00519, m=1.0.

    Johnson-Cook Constitutive Model in Practice

    JC in Practice

    ๐ŸŽ“

    Used for ballistic impact (armor plate penetration), high-speed metal cutting, and metal fracture in crash safety.


    Representative JC Parameter Values

    ๐ŸŽ“
    MaterialA (MPa)B (MPa)nCm
    Mild Steel (AISI 1018)2207500.400.0221.0
    Al 6061-T63241140.420.0021.34
    Ti-6Al-4V109810920.930.0141.1

    Practical Checklist

    ๐ŸŽ“
    • [ ] Are JC parameters obtained from material tests or Split Hopkinson bar tests?
    • [ ] Is the strain rate range within the fitting range of the JC parameters?
    • [ ] Is the JC failure criterion set (if evaluating ductile fracture)?
    • [ ] Are adiabatic conditions considered (softening due to temperature rise in high-speed deformation)?

    • Coffee Break Trivia

      Application to Bird Strike Analysis

      For bird strike analysis on aircraft engine fan blades, Johnson-Cook parameters for Ti-6Al-4V are essential. In FEA verification preceding FAR 33.76 certification tests, LS-DYNA and Abaqus Explicit are primarily used, with multiple cases reported in aerospace journals predicting blade tip deformation at 200 m/s impact velocity with ยฑ5 mm accuracy.

      Johnson-Cook Constitutive Model: Software & Solver Comparison

      JC Tools

      Related Simulators

      Experience the theory firsthand with the interactive simulator for this field

      All Simulators

      Related fields

      Rate this article
      Thank you for your feedback!
      Helpful
      More details
      Report error
      Helpful
      0
      More details
      0
      Report error
      0
      Written by NovaSolver Contributors
      Anonymous Engineers & AI โ€” Sitemap