Parameters
Ergun: ΔP/L = 150μU(1−ε)²/(d_p²ε³) + 1.75ρ_f U²(1−ε)/(d_p ε³)
Umf: solve ΔP/L·H = (ρ_p−ρ_f)(1−ε)gH
Adjust particle diameter, density and fluid viscosity to compute Archimedes number, minimum fluidization velocity Umf and terminal velocity Ut in real time. Visualize the Ergun pressure-drop vs velocity curve.
The core of the calculation starts with the Archimedes number, which is a dimensionless ratio of gravitational forces to viscous forces. It groups all the key material properties.
$$ Ar = \frac{\rho_f (\rho_p - \rho_f) g d_p^3}{\mu^2}$$Where:
$\rho_f$ = Fluid density (kg/m³)
$\rho_p$ = Particle density (kg/m³)
$g$ = Gravitational acceleration (9.81 m/s²)
$d_p$ = Particle diameter (m)
$\mu$ = Fluid dynamic viscosity (Pa·s)
A high Ar indicates a system where inertia dominates (e.g., large, dense particles in a gas).
The minimum fluidization velocity (Umf) is found by balancing the pressure drop across the bed (described by the Ergun equation) with the buoyant weight of the particle bed.
$$ \frac{\Delta P}{H}= 150 \frac{\mu U_{mf} (1-\varepsilon)^2}{d_p^2 \varepsilon^3}+ 1.75 \frac{\rho_f U_{mf}^2 (1-\varepsilon)}{d_p \varepsilon^3}= (\rho_p - \rho_f)(1-\varepsilon)g $$The left side is the Ergun equation for pressure drop per unit height. The first term is the viscous loss (laminar flow), and the second is the kinetic energy loss (turbulent flow). The right side is the net weight of the particles per unit volume. The simulator solves this equation for $U_{mf}$. The void fraction $\varepsilon$ is a critical parameter here—try adjusting it to see its strong effect on the calculated velocity.
Fluid Catalytic Cracking (FCC) in Oil Refineries: This is one of the largest-scale applications. Here, a powdered catalyst fluidized by hydrocarbon vapors cracks heavy oil into gasoline and other products. The excellent mixing and heat transfer of the fluidized bed are essential for the fast, controlled reaction. Simulators like this help engineers design the catalyst particle size and gas flow rates.
Pharmaceutical Coating and Drying: Tablet coating is often done in fluidized beds. A controlled air stream suspends tablets while a coating spray is applied, ensuring a uniform layer. Calculating the correct Umf ensures tablets are mixed gently without damage or attrition, which is critical for dose consistency.
Biomass Gasification and Combustion: Fluidized beds are ideal for burning or gasifying irregular, solid fuels like wood chips or agricultural waste. The turbulent mixing allows for efficient heat transfer and complete reactions at lower temperatures than traditional furnaces. Engineers use these calculations to size reactors for different fuel particle properties.
Chemical Vapor Deposition (CVD) for Solar Panels: In manufacturing materials like polysilicon, a fluidized bed reactor allows gaseous precursors to uniformly coat seed particles, building up high-purity material. Precise control of gas velocity (just above Umf) is needed to keep particles suspended for even coating without clumping or elutriation.
When you start using this simulator, there are several pitfalls that engineers, especially those with less field experience, often fall into. The first is thinking that "the calculated Umf is the operating velocity". In reality, the minimum fluidization velocity is merely the point where "fluidization begins". In actual equipment, operation is most often at velocities around 2 to 10 times Umf to actively mix particles or improve heat transfer. For example, even if Umf is calculated as 0.02 m/s for 100μm FCC catalyst particles, the actual fluidized bed reactor might be operating at 0.1 m/s or higher.
The second point concerns the definition and reality of "particle size". The simulator assumes uniform spheres, but real powders have a wide particle size distribution (PSD) and irregular shapes. Therefore, calculated values are only a guide. For actual equipment design, you need to select appropriate values for the representative diameter according to the purpose, such as using the Sauter mean diameter or median diameter. Also, under wet conditions, particles may agglomerate, increasing the "apparent particle size", which can cause a significant discrepancy between calculation results and actual phenomena.
The third point is over-reliance on the "constant value" of pressure drop. You learn that pressure drop becomes almost constant after fluidization begins, but this is for an ideal, homogeneous fluidized bed. In reality, in large-scale equipment, pressure drop fluctuates due to bubble formation and particle segregation. Understand the simulator's beautiful curve as a "theoretical skeleton"; for actual equipment, reconciling it with measured values is essential.
Sand particles with Dp=200 µm, ρp=2650 kg/m³, fluidized in air (ρf=1.2 kg/m³, μ=1.81×10⁻⁵ Pa·s). Calculator yields Ar≈210, Umf≈0.068 m/s, Ut≈4.8 m/s, ΔP≈850 Pa at minimum fluidization. Operating at 0.1 m/s airflow exceeds Umf, confirming vigorous bubbling bed regime suitable for combustion or drying applications.