OpenFOAM Turbulence Model

Category: 解析 | Integrated 2026-04-06
CAE visualization for openfoam turbulence theory - technical simulation diagram
OpenFOAM乱流モデル

Theory and Physics

Overview

🧑‍🎓

Teacher! Today's topic is about OpenFOAM turbulence models, right? What are they like?


🎓

It provides a rich variety of turbulence models: RANS (k-ε, k-ω SST), LES (Smagorinsky, WALE, dynamicK), DES/DDES, etc. They can be easily switched via turbulenceProperties.


🧑‍🎓

I see. So if you have such a rich variety of turbulence models, you're basically good to go?


Governing Equations


🎓

Expressing this with equations, it looks like this.


$$\frac{\partial k}{\partial t} + \nabla\cdot(\mathbf{U}k) = \nabla\cdot(\nu_{eff}\nabla k) + P_k - \varepsilon$$

🧑‍🎓

Hmm, just looking at the equation doesn't really click... What does it represent?


🎓

k-ω SST model:



$$\nu_t = \frac{a_1 k}{\max(a_1\omega, SF_2)}$$
🧑‍🎓

I see. So if the model is set up, you're basically good to go?


Theoretical Foundation

🧑‍🎓

I've heard of "theoretical foundation," but I might not fully understand it...


🎓

The numerical solution methods for OpenFOAM turbulence models are based on the Finite Volume Method (FVM) or the Finite Element Method (FEM). Being open-source, its greatest advantage is the ability to verify and modify algorithm details at the source code level. Discretization schemes and convergence criteria logic, which are black boxes in commercial solvers, can be directly verified, making it particularly suitable for academic research and method development. Continuous improvement and bug fixes by the community ensure its quality.



Theoretical Background of Numerical Solution Methods

🧑‍🎓

Teacher, please teach me about the "theoretical background of numerical solution methods"!


🎓

Explains the theoretical foundation of numerical solution methods implemented by open-source CAE tools.



Variational Principle of the Finite Element Method (FEM)

🧑‍🎓

Please teach me about the "Finite Element Method"!


🎓

The principle of minimum potential energy, fundamental to structural analysis:



$$ \Pi(\mathbf{u}) = \frac{1}{2} \int_{\Omega} \boldsymbol{\sigma} : \boldsymbol{\varepsilon} \, d\Omega - \int_{\Omega} \mathbf{f} \cdot \mathbf{u} \, d\Omega - \int_{\Gamma_t} \mathbf{t} \cdot \mathbf{u} \, d\Gamma $$


🎓

The displacement field $\mathbf{u}$ that makes $\Pi$ stationary is the equilibrium solution. CalculiX and Code_Aster implement the Galerkin method based on this variational principle.




Conservation Laws of the Finite Volume Method (FVM)

🧑‍🎓

Please teach me about the "Finite Volume Method"!


🎓

The FVM adopted by OpenFOAM is based on integral conservation laws for control volumes:



$$ \frac{\partial}{\partial t} \int_{V} \rho \phi \, dV + \oint_{S} \rho \phi \mathbf{u} \cdot d\mathbf{S} = \oint_{S} \Gamma \nabla \phi \cdot d\mathbf{S} + \int_{V} S_\phi \, dV $$


🎓

Discrete equations are obtained by applying this integral form to each control volume and numerically evaluating the fluxes on the faces.



License and Quality Assurance

🧑‍🎓

Please teach me about "License and Quality Assurance"!


🎓

Because the source code is open, algorithm verification by third parties is possible. On the other hand, there is no vendor support like with commercial tools, so information sharing within user communities and forums is important.



Application Conditions and Precautions

🧑‍🎓

I've heard of "Application Conditions and Precautions," but I might not fully understand it...


🎓
  • OSS tool results should always be verified against known benchmark problems.
  • Be aware of version incompatibilities (especially differences between OpenFOAM forks).
  • It is recommended to confirm OSS accuracy by comparing results with commercial tools.
  • When documentation is lacking, direct reference to the source code may be necessary.

🧑‍🎓

So, if you cut corners on verifying the tool's results, you'll pay for it later. I'll keep that in mind!


Dimensionless Parameters and Dominant Scales

🧑‍🎓

Teacher, please teach me about "Dimensionless Parameters and Dominant Scales"!


🎓

Understanding the dimensionless parameters governing the physical phenomenon being analyzed is fundamental to appropriate model selection and parameter setting.


🎓
  • Peclet Number Pe: Relative importance of convection and diffusion. Pe >> 1 indicates convection dominance (stabilization methods required).
  • Reynolds Number Re: Ratio of inertial forces to viscous forces. Fundamental parameter for fluid problems.
  • Biot Number Bi: Ratio of internal conduction to surface convection. For Bi < 0.1, the lumped capacitance method is applicable.
  • Courant Number CFL: Indicator of numerical stability. Explicit methods require CFL ≤ 1.

🧑‍🎓

Ah, I see! So that's how the mechanism of the physical phenomenon being analyzed works.



Verification via Dimensional Analysis

🧑‍🎓

Please teach me about "Verification via Dimensional Analysis"!


🎓

Dimensional analysis based on Buckingham's Π theorem is effective for order-of-magnitude estimation of analysis results. Using characteristic length $L$, characteristic velocity $U$, and characteristic time $T = L/U$, estimate the order of each physical quantity beforehand to confirm the validity of the analysis results.


🧑‍🎓

I see. So if you can do that for the physical phenomenon being analyzed, you're basically good to go?


Classification and Mathematical Characteristics of Boundary Conditions

🧑‍🎓

I've heard that if you mess up the boundary conditions, everything goes wrong...


TypeMathematical ExpressionPhysical MeaningExample
Dirichlet Condition$u = u_0$ on $\Gamma_D$Specification of variable valueFixed wall, specified temperature
Neumann Condition$\partial u/\partial n = g$ on $\Gamma_N$Specification of gradient (flux)Heat flux, force
Robin Condition$\alpha u + \beta \partial u/\partial n = h$Linear combination of variable and gradientConvective heat transfer
Periodic Boundary Condition$u(x) = u(x+L)$Spatial periodicityUnit cell analysis
🎓

Choosing appropriate boundary conditions is directly linked to solution uniqueness and physical validity. Insufficient boundary conditions lead to an ill-posed problem, while excessive ones cause contradictions.



🧑‍🎓

I've grasped the overall picture of OpenFOAM turbulence models! I'll try to be mindful of them in my practical work starting tomorrow.


🎓

Yeah, you're doing great! Actually getting your hands dirty is the best way to learn. If you don't understand something, feel free to ask anytime.


Coffee Break Casual Talk

The Real Reason the k-ε Model Has Been Used for Over 50 Years

The k-ε model proposed by Jones and Launder in 1972 is still active today in OpenFOAM as kEpsilon.C. Even though it is often inferior in accuracy to k-ω SST or LES in many situations, why does it continue to be used? The answer lies in practical reasons: "stable convergence" and "low computational cost." In the industrial design phase, "getting results by yesterday" can sometimes take priority over 1% accuracy. In European automotive manufacturers, a two-stage approach is becoming standardized: using k-ε for initial aerodynamic screening of exterior styling and LES for final confirmation. The "age" of a model and its "usage" are separate matters.

Physical Meaning of Each Term
  • Time derivative of conserved quantity: Represents the rate of change over time of the physical quantity in question. Becomes zero for steady-state problems. 【Image】When filling a bathtub with hot water, the water level rises over time—this "rate of change per time" is the time derivative. The state where the valve is closed and the water level is constant is "steady," and the time derivative is zero.
  • Flux term (flow term): Describes the spatial transport/diffusion of the physical quantity. Broadly classified into convection and diffusion. 【Image】Convection is like "a river's flow carrying a boat," where things are carried by the flow. Diffusion is like "ink naturally spreading in still water," where things move due to concentration differences. The competition between these two transport mechanisms governs many physical phenomena.
  • Source term (generation/destruction term): Represents the local generation or destruction of the physical quantity, such as external forces or reaction terms. 【Image】Turning on a heater in a room "generates" thermal energy at that location. When fuel is consumed in a chemical reaction, mass is "destroyed." A term representing physical quantities injected into the system from the outside.
Assumptions and Applicability Limits
  • The continuum assumption holds for the spatial scale.
  • The constitutive laws of the material/fluid (stress-strain relationship, Newtonian fluid law, etc.) are within the applicable range.
  • Boundary conditions are physically reasonable and mathematically well-defined.
Dimensional Analysis and Unit Systems
VariableSI UnitNotes / Conversion Memo
Characteristic length $L$mMust match the unit system of the CAD model.
Characteristic time $t$sFor transient analysis, time step should consider CFL condition and physical time constants.

Numerical Solution Methods and Implementation

Details of Numerical Methods

🧑‍🎓

Specifically, what algorithms are used to solve OpenFOAM turbulence models?


🎓

Explains key points of numerical solution methods and implementation for OpenFOAM turbulence models.



Compilation and Build

🧑‍🎓

I've heard of "Compilation and Build," but I might not fully understand it...


🎓

Building from source code uses CMake or dedicated build systems (like OpenFOAM's wmake). Proper version management of dependency libraries (MPI, PETSc, BLAS/LAPACK, etc.) is important. Linux environment is recommended, but using WSL2 or Docker containers makes it possible to set up on Windows as well.


🧑‍🎓

関連する分野

この記事の評価
ご回答ありがとうございます!
参考に
なった
もっと
詳しく
誤りを
報告
参考になった
0
もっと詳しく
0
誤りを報告
0
Written by NovaSolver Contributors
Anonymous Engineers & AI — サイトマップ