Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criterion

Category: Structural Analysis | Integrated 2026-04-06
CAE visualization for mohr coulomb theory - technical simulation diagram
Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criterion

Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criterion: Theoretical Foundations

What is the Mohr-Coulomb Criterion?

🧑‍🎓

Professor, the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion is fundamental in soil mechanics, right?


🎓

The Mohr-Coulomb (MC) criterion is the most classical criterion describing the shear failure of soil and rock. Proposed by Coulomb in 1773.


$$ \tau = c + \sigma_n \tan\phi $$

  • $\tau$ — Shear stress (on the failure plane)
  • $c$ — Cohesion
  • $\sigma_n$ — Normal stress (compression positive)
  • $\phi$ — Internal friction angle

🧑‍🎓

How does it differ from von Mises?


🎓

von Mises is independent of hydrostatic pressure (mean stress). The MC criterion depends on hydrostatic pressure (contains normal stress $\sigma_n$). Soil's shear strength increases with greater confining pressure. This is the essence of the MC criterion.


Principal Stress Representation

🎓
$$ \sigma_1 - \sigma_3 = 2c\cos\phi + (\sigma_1 + \sigma_3)\sin\phi $$

In deviatoric stress space, it forms an irregular hexagon (different from von Mises's cylinder).


Settings in FEM

🎓
  • Abaqus: *MOHR COULOMB ($\phi, c, \psi$). $\psi$ is the dilation angle
  • Ansys: TB, DP or TB, MC
  • Plaxis: Built-in (GUI settings)

  • Summary

    🎓

    Key Points:


    • $\tau = c + \sigma_n \tan\phi$ — Shear strength depends on normal stress
    • Two parameters: $c$ (cohesion) and $\phi$ (friction angle)
    • Hydrostatic pressure dependence — Fundamental difference from von Mises
    • Failure criterion for soil, rock, concrete — Fundamental in geotechnical engineering

    Coffee Break Trivia

    Origin of Coulomb's Friction Law

    Charles-Augustin de Coulomb organized experimental data on landslides in 1776, showing that shear strength can be expressed as τ=c+σtanφ. Later in 1900, Otto Mohr combined it with a geometric interpretation in principal stress space (Mohr's circle), systematizing it as the Mohr-Coulomb failure criterion. It has been used continuously in rock/soil mechanics for nearly 250 years.

    Computational Methods for Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criterion

    FEM Treatment of MC Criterion

    🎓

    The MC criterion's yield surface has corners. Stress return mapping at corners is numerically challenging.


    🎓

    Countermeasures:

    • Approximation with Drucker-Prager (DP) criterion — Approximation with a conical surface (no corners). Good convergence.
    • Exact treatment of MC criterion — Special handling at corners. Abaqus supports exact MC.
    • Plaxis — Fully supports MC criterion. Strength of specialized geotechnical software.

    Dilation Angle $\psi$

    🎓

    The dilation angle $\psi$ determines the direction of plastic flow. If $\psi = \phi$ (associated flow), volumetric expansion is overestimated. Usually $\psi < \phi$ (non-associated flow).


    🧑‍🎓

    Associated vs. non-associated?


    🎓

    Associated means the yield surface and plastic potential are the same ($\psi = \phi$). Non-associated means they are different ($\psi < \phi$). For soil, $\psi = 0 \sim \phi/3$ is practical.


    Summary

    🎓
    • MC criterion has corners — Return mapping is numerically difficult
    • Approximation with DP criterion — Good convergence
    • Dilation angle $\psi$ — $\psi < \phi$ (non-associated flow) is standard

    • Coffee Break Trivia

      Triaxial Test Identification of c and φ

      Cohesion c and internal friction angle φ are identified from triaxial compression tests (CU or CD tests). Confining pressure σ₃ is varied over three or more stages, plotted on the τ-σ plane, and the slope (tanφ) and intercept (c) of the common tangent to the Mohr circles are determined by least squares. Typical ranges: φ for sandy soil is 28–40°, c for clay is 0–100 kPa.

      Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criterion in Practice

      MC Criterion in Practice

      🎓

      Used in geotechnical analysis for excavation, slope stability, retaining walls, tunnels, and dam foundations.


      Typical Geotechnical Parameter Values

      🎓
      Soil/Rock$c$ (kPa)$\phi$ (°)
      Soft clay10–250–5
      Medium clay25–5015–25
      Sand (loose)0–528–32
      Sand (dense)0–535–42
      Rock (weak)100–50025–35
      Rock (hard)1000–500035–55

      Practical Checklist

      🎓
      • [ ] Are $c$ and $\phi$ based on site investigation (triaxial tests)?
      • [ ] Is the dilation angle $\psi$ appropriate ($\psi \leq \phi$)?
      • [ ] Are drainage/undrained conditions correct?
      • [ ] Is initial earth pressure ($K_0$ method) set?

      • Coffee Break Trivia

        Tunnel Excavation Analysis Track Record

        For the design of excavation support for the Gotthard Base Tunnel (Switzerland, 57 km total length) completed in 2016, Mohr-Coulomb parameters φ and c for granite rock mass were analyzed using Phase2 (now Rocscience RS2). It was reported that the prediction accuracy of shear failure zones under high confining pressure matched field measurements within ±10%.

        Mohr-Coulomb Failure Criterion: Software & Solver Comparison

        Tools for MC Criterion

        🎓
        • Plaxis — Most intuitive GUI settings for MC criterion. Geotechnical-specific.
        • Abaqus *MOHR COULOMB — Exact MC. General-purpose FEM.
        • Ansys — Primarily uses Drucker-Prager approximation.
        • FLAC — Finite difference method. Rock mechanics.

        • Selection Guide

          🎓
          • Soil excavation/slopes → Plaxis (geotechnical-specific. Easiest to use)
          • Soil in general-purpose FEMAbaqus (exact MC support)
          • Rock mechanics → FLAC, Rocscience RS2

          • Related Simulators

            Experience the theory with interactive simulators in this field

            All Simulators

            Related Topics

            Rate this article
            Thank you for your feedback!
            Helpful
            More details
            Report error
            Helpful
            0
            More details
            0
            Report error
            0
            Written by NovaSolver Contributors
            Anonymous Engineers & AI — Sitemap
            About the Authors