Heat Transfer in Pin-Fin Arrays

Category: Thermal – Forced Convection | Revised 2026-10-01
CAE visualization for pin fin array theory - technical simulation diagram
Heat Transfer in Pin-Fin Arrays

Theory: pin fins as a bank of thin cylinders

Overview

🙋

What's good about pin-fin heat sinks compared with plate fins?

🎓

Thin cylinders have thin boundary layers and high heat transfer coefficients, and they work with flow from any direction. But thin pins conduct poorly from root to tip, so the tip runs cooler and contributes less — captured by fin efficiency. Heat transfer comes from the Zukauskas correlation treating pins as a tube bank, and efficiency from fin theory. Let's see how dissipation changes with material and arrangement.

Zukauskas correlation

$$ Nu_d = C_2\,C\,Re_{d,max}^{\,m}\,Pr^{0.36}\left(\frac{Pr}{Pr_s}\right)^{1/4},\qquad Re_{d,max} = \frac{V_{max} d}{\nu},\quad V_{max} = \frac{S_T}{S_T - d}V $$

For Re = 10³ to 2×10⁵: in-line C = 0.27, m = 0.63; staggered C = 0.35(S_T/S_L)^0.2, m = 0.60. C₂ corrects for the number of rows, about 0.97 for ten rows.

Fin efficiency

$$ \eta_f = \frac{\tanh(m L_c)}{m L_c},\qquad m = \sqrt{\frac{4h}{k_f d}},\quad L_c = H + \frac{d}{4} $$

Tip heat loss is approximated by the corrected length $L_c$, extended by d/4. Larger $mL_c$ means lower efficiency.

Coffee Break Trivia

Heat transfer in tube banks

Tube-bank heat transfer has been studied through many experiments since the early 20th century for boilers and heat exchangers. In 1972 Lithuania's Zukauskas reorganised those experiments over a wide Reynolds range, giving correlations for both in-line and staggered banks. A pin-fin heat sink is that tube-bank idea scaled down; pin fins are also used for internal cooling of aircraft-engine turbine blades.

Worked example: a 10×10 pin-fin array

Pins 2 mm diameter, 15 mm tall, 4 mm pitch both ways, on a 40×40 mm base; 25 °C air at 5 m/s; base 40 K above air.

Heat transfer coefficient

ArrangementMax velocityRe_maxNuh
In-line10.0 m/s1,27420.9275 W/m²K
Staggered10.0 m/s1,27421.9288 W/m²K

Material, efficiency and dissipation (in-line)

MaterialConductivityFin efficiencyDissipation
Copper390 W/mK0.90111 W
Aluminium200 W/mK0.83103 W
Steel16 W/mK0.3551 W
Plastic1 W/mK0.0924 W

A bare 40 mm square plate gives h = 44 W/m²K and 2.8 W. Pins multiply area by 6.9, and with the high coefficient of thin cylinders, aluminium dissipates 37 times as much.

🙋

The same shape in steel halves the dissipation.

🎓

Pin h is high, about 280 W/m²K, so heat leaves the surface quickly. If conduction from root to tip can't keep up, the tip cools and contributes little. Aluminium pins work at 83% to the tip, steel at 35% and plastic at only 9% — plastic pins are effectively used only near the root. So the higher the heat transfer coefficient, the thicker, shorter and more conductive pins must be. Conversely, with low coefficients as in natural convection, low-conductivity materials lose much less efficiency.

Design tips

  1. Compute Reynolds number with the maximum velocity between pins (check diagonal gaps for staggered).
  2. Check fin efficiency; if below about 0.7, make pins thicker and shorter or change material.
  3. Account for bypass over and around the array; ducting improves performance.
  4. Compute pressure drop and match the fan curve to find the operating point.
  5. Pins too close put downstream pins in the wake of upstream ones.
Coffee Break Trivia

“The flow went around the pins”

One heat sink failed to cool as well as its catalogue value. Investigation found a large gap above it: much of the fan air bypassed the pins through the low-resistance gap. Pin fins have high pressure drop, so air takes any escape route available. Covering the top with a plate to close the gap increased flow through the pins and lowered temperature considerably.

Common mistakes

Mistakes and fixes

MistakeEffectFix
Re from approach velocityh underestimatedUse max velocity
Efficiency = 1Dissipation overestimatedCompute efficiency
Ignoring bypassPoor real performanceDuct the array
Ignoring pressure dropInsufficient airflowFind fan operating point
Forgetting row correctionOverestimate for few rowsApply C₂
🙋

I'd like to learn related topics.

Related Simulators

Experience the theory firsthand with the interactive simulator for this field

All Simulators

Related fields

Structural AnalysisFluid Analysis (CFD)Manufacturing & Process Simulation
Rate this article
Thank you for your feedback!
Helpful
More details
Report error
Helpful
0
More details
0
Report error
0