Board-Level Thermal Analysis

Category: Thermal Analysis | Integrated 2026-04-06
CAE visualization for board level thermal theory - technical simulation diagram
Substrate-Level Thermal Analysis

Board-Level Thermal: Theoretical Foundations

Overview

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

Teacher! Today's topic is about board-level thermal analysis, right? What exactly is it?


๐ŸŽ“

An anisotropic thermal conduction model for multilayer PCBs. Evaluation of effective thermal conductivity due to copper wiring patterns. Used for component placement optimization.



๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

Your explanation is easy to understand! The haze around the anisotropic thermal conduction model has cleared up.


Governing Equations




$$ k_{eff,\parallel} = \sum v_i k_i $$
$$ k_{eff,\perp} = \left(\sum \frac{v_i}{k_i}\right)^{-1} $$




Discretization Methods

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

How do you actually solve these equations on a computer?


๐ŸŽ“

We use spatial discretization by the Finite Element Method (FEM). We assemble the element stiffness matrix and construct the global stiffness equation.


๐ŸŽ“

We perform a transformation to the weak form (variational form) and use formulation by the Galerkin method using test functions and shape functions. The choice of element type (low-order elements vs. high-order elements, full integration vs. reduced integration) is directly linked to the trade-off between solution accuracy and computational cost.




Matrix Solution Algorithms

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

What exactly are matrix solution algorithms?


๐ŸŽ“

We solve the simultaneous equations using direct methods (LU decomposition, Cholesky decomposition) or iterative methods (CG method, GMRES method). For large-scale problems, preconditioned iterative methods are effective.



SolverClassificationMemory UsageApplicable Scale
LU decompositionDirect MethodO(nยฒ)Small to Medium Scale
Cholesky decompositionDirect Method (Symmetric Positive Definite)O(nยฒ)Small to Medium Scale
PCG MethodIterative MethodO(n)Large Scale
GMRES methodIterative MethodO(nยทm)Large Scale / Non-symmetric
AMG PreconditionerPreprocessingO(n)Very Large Scale
๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

So, if you cut corners on the finite element method part, you'll pay for it later. I'll keep that in mind!


Implementation in Commercial Tools

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

So, what software can be used to do board-level thermal analysis?


Tool NameDeveloper/CurrentMain File Formats
Ansys Mechanical (formerly ANSYS Structural)Ansys Inc..cdb, .rst, .db, .ans, .mac
COMSOL MultiphysicsCOMSOL AB.mph
Ansys FluentAnsys Inc..cas, .dat, .msh, .jou
Simcenter STAR-CCM+Siemens Digital Industries Software.sim, .java, .csv

Vendor History and Product Integration Background

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

Is the origin of each software quite dramatic?



Ansys Mechanical (formerly ANSYS Structural)

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

Tell me about "Ansys Mechanical"!


๐ŸŽ“

Developed in 1970 by Swanson Analysis Systems Inc. (SASI). APDL (Ansys Parametric Design Language) based.

Current affiliation: Ansys Inc.



COMSOL Multiphysics

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

Tell me about "COMSOL Multiphysics"!


๐ŸŽ“

Founded in 1986 in Sweden. Started as FEMLAB with MATLAB integration, later renamed COMSOL. Strong in multiphysics.

Current affiliation: COMSOL AB


๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

After hearing this, I finally understand why the development of is so important!



Ansys Fluent

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

Next is the story about Ansys Fluent. What's it about?


๐ŸŽ“

Developed by Fluent Inc. Acquired by Ansys in 2006. A general-purpose unstructured grid-based CFD solver.

Current affiliation: Ansys Inc.


๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

Wow, the story about the development of is super interesting! Tell me more.


File Formats and Interoperability

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

Are there any points to note when transferring data between different software?


FormatExtensionTypeOverview
STEP.stp/.stepNeutral CAD3D CAD data exchange format compliant with ISO 10303. Supports geometry + PMI.
IGES.igs/.igesNeutral CADEarly CAD data exchange standard. Has issues with surface data compatibility. Transition to STEP is progressing.
VTK.vtk/.vtuVisualizationVisualization Toolkit format. Used by ParaView, etc.
๐ŸŽ“

When converting models between different solvers, attention must be paid to the correspondence of element types, compatibility of material models, and differences in the representation of loads and boundary conditions. Particularly, high-order elements and special elements (cohesive elements, user-defined elements, etc.) often cannot be directly converted between solvers.


๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

I see... Formats seem simple at first glance, but they're actually quite deep.


Practical Considerations

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

Are there things like "field wisdom" that aren't in textbooks?


๐ŸŽ“
Related Simulators

Experience the theory firsthand with the interactive simulator for this field

All Simulators

Related fields

Rate this article
Thank you for your feedback!
Helpful
More details
Report error
Helpful
0
More details
0
Report error
0
Written by NovaSolver Contributors
Anonymous Engineers & AI โ€” Sitemap