| Parameter | Value | Unit |
|---|---|---|
| Advance force (theoretical) | — | N |
| Advance force (actual) | — | N |
| Retract force (actual) | — | N |
| Bore area | — | cm² |
| Rod-side area | — | cm² |
| Air/stroke — advance | — | NL |
| Air/stroke — retract | — | NL |
| Air/cycle (total) | — | NL |
| Total flow (all cylinders) | — | NL/min |
| Pipe velocity (approx.) | — | m/s |
| Pipe pressure drop | — | kPa |
Theory Notes
Cylinder forces:
$$F_{\text{adv}} = \frac{\pi}{4}D^2 \cdot P \cdot \eta, \quad F_{\text{ret}} = \frac{\pi}{4}(D^2 - d^2) \cdot P \cdot \eta$$Air consumption (standard conditions):
$$Q_{\text{std}} = \frac{P_{\text{abs}}}{P_{\text{atm}}} \cdot \frac{\pi}{4}D^2 \cdot L \quad \text{[NL/stroke]}$$Pressure drop (Darcy-Weisbach, compressible approx.):
$$\Delta P \approx f \cdot \frac{L}{d} \cdot \frac{\rho_{\text{actual}} \cdot v^2}{2}$$Engineer Dialogue — "Why does advance force differ from retract force?"
🧑🎓 "I calculated the forces on a double-acting cylinder and the advance and retract numbers came out different. Is that right?"
🎓 "Yes, that's correct. The rod extends from one end of the cylinder, so the retract side (rod side) has less effective area — it's the bore area minus the rod cross-section. Less area at the same pressure means less force."
🧑🎓 "How big is the difference typically?"
🎓 "For a typical ISO cylinder — bore 63 mm, rod 20 mm — the area ratio is (63²−20²)/63² ≈ 90%. So retract force is about 90% of advance force. But with a large rod (say bore 63 mm, rod 40 mm), the ratio drops to about 60%. That's why pneumatic presses that need equal force in both directions sometimes use double-rod cylinders."
🧑🎓 "What's the most common mistake when sizing a compressor for a production line?"
🎓 "Forgetting to account for simultaneity — not all cylinders actuate at the same instant. You also need to add a 1.5–2× safety margin for leakage, future expansion, and start-up surges. Many plants end up over-pressurizing their lines because the compressor is oversized, which wastes energy. Every 0.1 MPa reduction in line pressure saves roughly 6–8% in compressor energy."