Power Module Packaging Analysis

Category: Electromagnetic Analysis – Power Electronics | Revised 2026-10-01
CAE visualization for power module packaging theory - technical simulation diagram
Power Module Packaging Analysis

Theory: a layered heat path

Overview

🙋

Where should I start in estimating power module die temperature?

🎓

Heat from the die escapes through layer after layer to the heatsink: solder under the die, copper traces, insulating ceramic, another copper layer, substrate solder, a thick copper baseplate and thermal grease against the heatsink. Each has thermal resistance; their sum times power gives temperature rise. Heat spreads sideways as it descends, so lower layers have larger areas and less resistance. Start with this 1D stack to see which layers matter, then confirm with 3D thermal analysis.

Layer resistance with heat spreading

$$ R_i = \frac{t_i}{k_i\,a_{i}\,a_{i+1}},\qquad a_{i+1} = a_i + 2t_i\tan 45^\circ,\qquad \Delta T_j = P\sum_i R_i $$

a is the side of the square heat-flow area, starting at the 10 mm die and spreading at 45° through each layer (capped at the 60 mm baseplate). Layer area is the geometric mean of inlet and outlet. Stack: SiC die 0.35 mm (370 W/mK), solder 0.1 mm (50), copper 0.3 mm (390), ceramic, copper 0.3 mm, solder 0.1 mm, copper baseplate 3 mm (390), thermal grease 0.1 mm (3).

Thermal-expansion mismatch

$$ \varepsilon_{mis} = (\alpha_{Cu} - \alpha_{cer})\,\Delta T $$
Coffee Break Trivia

Starting from broken wire bonds

Typical life-limiting failures in power modules are aluminium bond wires on the die lifting off at their roots under temperature cycling, and cracks growing in solder beneath the die and substrate. Both arise from strain repeated at each temperature change due to differing thermal expansion. Reliability was studied in detail from the 1990s for railway and industrial use; with EVs and high-temperature SiC operation, sintered-silver bonding and wire-free structures are spreading.

Worked examples

Example 1: ceramic type and thermal resistance (10 mm die, 200 W)

LayerAlumina 0.32 mmAlN 0.635 mmSi3N4 0.32 mm
SiC die0.0090.0090.009
Die solder0.0170.0170.017
Ceramic0.0960.0250.025
Cu baseplate0.0310.0290.031
Thermal grease0.0920.0860.092
Junction to case0.1760.1020.106
Junction to heatsink0.2680.1880.198
Rise at 200 W54 K38 K40 K

Units K/W (except last row). The two copper layers and substrate solder total about 0.02 K/W and are omitted.

Example 2: copper–ceramic expansion mismatch (100 K)

CeramicCTEDifference from CuMismatch strain
Alumina7 ppm/K10 ppm/K0.10%
AlN4.5 ppm/K12.5 ppm/K0.12%
Si3N43 ppm/K14 ppm/K0.14%
🙋

Si3N4 has the largest mismatch with copper, so why is it called the most cycling-resistant?

🎓

Because what matters is not only the mismatch strain but whether the ceramic survives it. Thermal cycling concentrates stress at the edges of the copper–ceramic interface, cracking the ceramic or peeling the copper. Silicon nitride's fracture toughness is about twice that of alumina or AlN, so it tolerates thick copper, which also spreads heat and lowers resistance further. AlN conducts well but cracks easily and needs about 0.635 mm thickness; as the table shows, thin Si3N4 matches thick AlN thermally. The other key point is the grease, the largest layer here: better substrates and dies won't cool the die if grease is applied thick, so design must include baseplate warpage and grease thickness control.

Analysis workflow

  1. Estimate each layer's resistance with a 1D stack to find dominant layers.
  2. Confirm multi-die thermal interaction and spreading with 3D analysis.
  3. Derive losses from current waveforms and compute die temperature swings with transient thermal impedance.
  4. Estimate solder and wire life from temperature swing with lifetime models.
  5. Compare with thermocouple, infrared and thermal-transient measurements.
Coffee Break Trivia

“Identical modules ran 10 K apart”

In one system, identical power modules side by side showed die temperatures differing by up to about 10 K. Hand-applied grease varied, exceeding 0.2 mm in places. With grease accounting for over 30% of thermal resistance, doubling its thickness markedly raises temperature. Screen-printing the grease to uniform thickness and setting a tightening sequence that accounts for baseplate warpage reduced the spread to about 2 K.

Common mistakes

Mistakes and fixes

MistakeEffectFix
Ignoring spreadingLower-layer resistance overestimatedAccount for spreading
Omitting greaseTemperature underestimatedInclude thickness variation
Steady-state onlyTemperature swings missedTransient impedance
Choosing substrate on conductivity aloneCracks under cyclingConsider toughness
Ignoring die-to-die couplingCentre die overheatsAnalyse in 3D
🙋

I'd like to learn related topics.

Related Simulators

Experience the theory with interactive simulators in this field

Simulator List

Related Fields

Coupled AnalysisStructural AnalysisThermal Analysis
Rate this article
Thank you for your response!
Helpful
More
Detail
Report
Error
Helpful
0
More Detail
0
Report Error
0
Written by the NovaSolver Editorial Team
Built with engineers and AI (editorial policy) — Sitemap
View Profile