Simple Evaluation Using Miles' Equation

Category: Structural Analysis | Integrated 2026-04-06
CAE visualization for miles equation theory - technical simulation diagram
Simplified Evaluation Using the Miles Equation

Simple Evaluation Using Miles' Equation: Theoretical Foundations

What is the Miles Equation?

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

Professor, what is the Miles equation?


๐ŸŽ“

It is a simplified formula for random vibration of a single-degree-of-freedom system derived by John Miles (1954). When the input PSD is constant (white noise approximation), the RMS value of the response can be obtained with a single-line equation.


$$ x_{rms} = \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2} \frac{f_n S_{in}(f_n)}{\zeta}} $$

Or acceleration RMS:


$$ a_{rms} = \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2} f_n Q \cdot S_{\ddot{u}}(f_n)} $$

Here $Q = 1/(2\zeta)$ is the quality factor of resonance, and $S_{\ddot{u}}(f_n)$ is the input acceleration PSD at the natural frequency.


๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

It can be calculated in one line without FEM!


๐ŸŽ“

The Miles equation is ideal for screening evaluation. It provides a rough estimate before performing FEM PSD analysis to grasp the order of magnitude.


Assumptions and Limitations

๐ŸŽ“

Assumptions of the Miles equation:

1. Single-degree-of-freedom system โ€” Cannot be directly applied to multi-degree-of-freedom systems

2. Input PSD is constant near the natural frequency โ€” White noise approximation

3. Small damping โ€” Approximately $\zeta < 0.1$


๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

What happens if the input PSD is not constant?


๐ŸŽ“

Using the input PSD value at the natural frequency $f_n$ yields accuracy within 10-20% in many cases. It becomes inaccurate when the input PSD changes rapidly near $f_n$.


Practical Usage

๐ŸŽ“

Practical steps for using the Miles equation:


1. Estimate the equipment's first natural frequency $f_n$

2. Read the PSD value $S(f_n)$ from the vibration environment specification

3. Assume a damping ratio $\zeta$ (typically $\zeta = 0.02 \sim 0.05$)

4. Calculate the RMS response

5. Estimate the maximum response using 3ฯƒ (3ร—RMS)

6. Compare with allowable values


๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

So there are situations where it can be used instead of FEM.


๐ŸŽ“

It is sufficient for screening during the conceptual design phase. For detailed design, proceed to FEM PSD analysis.


Summary

๐ŸŽ“

Key points:


  • $a_{rms} = \sqrt{\pi f_n Q S(f_n) / 2}$ โ€” A single-line formula
  • Ideal for screening evaluation โ€” Rough estimate before FEM
  • White noise approximation โ€” Input PSD is constant near $f_n$
  • Use 3ฯƒ for maximum response โ€” Can be used as a design value
  • Not directly applicable to multi-degree-of-freedom systems โ€” Can be applied individually to each mode

Coffee Break Yomoyama Talk

The Secret Story of the Miles Equation's Birth

The origin is the paper "On Structural Fatigue Under Random Loading" published by John W. Miles in 1954 in the Journal of the Aeronautical Sciences. Against the backdrop of the era when the U.S. Air Force struggled to predict aircraft fatigue failure, this groundbreaking formula was born under the bold assumptions of white noise approximation and a single-degree-of-freedom system, enabling the calculation of response RMS with just three parameters.

Computational Methods for Simple Evaluation Using Miles' Equation

Miles Equation Calculation Example

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

Please show me a specific calculation example.


๐ŸŽ“

Vibration evaluation of an electronic device's printed circuit board (PCB):


  • $f_n = 200$ Hz (PCB's first natural frequency)
  • $S_{\ddot{u}} = 0.04$ gยฒ/Hz (Input PSD from MIL-STD-810)
  • $Q = 20$ ($\zeta = 2.5\%$)

$$ a_{rms} = \sqrt{\frac{\pi}{2} \times 200 \times 20 \times 0.04} = \sqrt{502} = 22.4 \text{ g (rms)} $$

$$ a_{3\sigma} = 3 \times 22.4 = 67 \text{ g} $$

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

67 G acceleration! I'm worried if the BGA solder on the PCB can withstand that.


๐ŸŽ“

Typical shock resistance acceleration for BGA is 50-100 G. If the Miles equation gives 67 G, detailed evaluation with FEM is necessary. Consider PCB reinforcement or mounting changes.


Extension to Multi-Mode Systems

๐ŸŽ“

For multi-degree-of-freedom systems, apply Miles to each mode and combine using SRSS (Square Root of Sum of Squares):


$$ a_{rms,total} = \sqrt{\sum_i a_{rms,i}^2} $$

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

Combine contributions from each mode using the square root of the sum of squares. Same as SRSS in response spectrum method, right?


๐ŸŽ“

SRSS combination is accurate if modes are sufficiently separated (approximately $f_{i+1}/f_i > 1.2$). For closely spaced modes, CQC (Complete Quadratic Combination) is required.


Summary

๐ŸŽ“
  • Hand calculation gives 22.4 g (rms), 67 G at 3ฯƒ โ€” Screening before FEM
  • Combine multiple modes with SRSS โ€” Use CQC for closely spaced modes
  • Two-step process: Miles equation โ†’ FEM PSD analysis โ€” Rough estimate โ†’ detailed

  • Coffee Break Yomoyama Talk

    3-Step Calculation Method for Miles Equation

    The application procedure for the Miles equation is 3 steps: โ‘  Confirm natural frequency fn (Hz), โ‘ก Read the input PSD value Gยฒ/Hz (W(fn)) at fn, โ‘ข Calculate response RMS = โˆš(ฯ€/2 ร— fn ร— Q ร— W(fn)). The Q value (โ‰ˆ1/(2ฮถ)) is determined from the structural damping ratio ฮถ, typically assumed as Q=10 (ฮถ=5%) for aerospace structures. The calculation can be completed in 10 seconds even in Excel.

    Simple Evaluation Using Miles' Equation in Practice

    Miles Equation in Practice

    ๐ŸŽ“

    Widely used for screening in random vibration evaluation of electronic equipment, space equipment, and military equipment.


    Sensitivity Parameters

    ๐ŸŽ“

    Parameters that most affect response in the Miles equation:


    ParameterEffect on ResponseNotes
    $Q$ (Quality Factor)$a_{rms} \propto \sqrt{Q}$If $Q$ doubles โ†’ RMS increases by $\sqrt{2}$ times
    $f_n$ (Natural Frequency)$a_{rms} \propto \sqrt{f_n}$Higher $f_n$ โ†’ Larger RMS
    $S(f_n)$ (Input PSD)$a_{rms} \propto \sqrt{S}$If input doubles โ†’ RMS increases by $\sqrt{2}$ times
    ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

    $Q$ (inverse of damping) is the most uncertain parameter, right?


    ๐ŸŽ“

    Response changes by $\sqrt{5} \approx 2.2$ times between $Q = 10$ and $Q = 50$. The accuracy of damping estimation governs the accuracy of the Miles equation.


    Practical Checklist

    ๐ŸŽ“
    • [ ] Is the estimation of $f_n$ reasonable? (Hand calculation or FEM first natural frequency)
    • [ ] Is $S(f_n)$ correctly read from the standard PSD table?
    • [ ] Is the assumption for $Q$ appropriate? ($Q = 10 \sim 50$. Structure-dependent)
    • [ ] Was the maximum response calculated using 3ฯƒ?
    • [ ] Do the Miles equation estimate and FEM results align?

    • ๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“