Notch Fatigue (Notch Effect)

Category: Structural Analysis | Integrated 2026-04-06
CAE visualization for notch fatigue theory - technical simulation diagram
Notch Fatigue (Notch Effect)

Notch Fatigue (Notch Effect): Theoretical Foundations

Notch Effect

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

Professor, how do we evaluate fatigue at notches?


๐ŸŽ“

Notches (holes, fillets, grooves) significantly reduce fatigue life due to stress concentration. The relationship between the theoretical stress concentration factor $K_t$ and the fatigue notch factor $K_f$ is important.


$$ K_f = 1 + q(K_t - 1) $$

$q$ is the notch sensitivity (depends on material and notch radius, 0~1). Higher strength materials have $q \to 1$.


Notch Stress in FEM

๐ŸŽ“

FEM directly calculates notch stress including $K_t$. This stress is evaluated using an S-N curve (notch stress-based).


Neuber's Rule

๐ŸŽ“

Neuber's rule estimates elastoplastic local strain from elastic FEM stress:


$$ K_t^2 = K_\sigma \cdot K_\varepsilon $$

$K_\sigma$ is the stress concentration factor, $K_\varepsilon$ is the strain concentration factor. Estimates local strain without elastoplastic FEM.


Summary

๐ŸŽ“
  • $K_f = 1 + q(K_t-1)$ โ€” Fatigue notch factor
  • FEM directly calculates notch stress โ€” $K_t$ is automatically included
  • Neuber's rule โ€” Estimates elastoplastic strain from elastic stress
  • Notch stress-based S-N curve โ€” Directly compared with FEM stress

  • Coffee Break Yomoyama Talk

    Neuber's Kt-Kf Problem

    The ratio (sensitivity factor q) between the theoretical stress concentration factor Kt and the fatigue notch factor Kf varies with material strength and notch dimensions. For high-strength steel (1500MPa class), qโ‰ˆ1.0 (Kt and Kf are almost equal), but for mild steel, qโ‰ˆ0.6. Neuber (1936) explained this difference is due to the stress gradient at the notch root, and this forms the basis of current ISO/ASME standards for structural strength design.

    Computational Methods for Notch Fatigue (Notch Effect)

    FEM for Notch Fatigue

    ๐ŸŽ“

    Two approaches:

    1. Direct Approach โ€” Elastoplastic FEM โ†’ local strain โ†’ Coffin-Manson

    2. Neuber Approach โ€” Elastic FEM โ†’ Neuber's rule to estimate local strain โ†’ Coffin-Manson


    Fatigue software (nCode, fe-safe) supports both approaches.


    Summary

    ๐ŸŽ“
    • Elastoplastic FEM โ€” Direct but computationally expensive
    • Elastic FEM + Neuber's rule โ€” Approximate but fast. Standard in nCode/fe-safe

    • Coffee Break Yomoyama Talk

      Practical Estimation Formula for Notch Fatigue Limit

      Peterson's formula (Kf=1+q(Kt-1)) is widely used to estimate notch fatigue limits. q is a parameter representing the material's "gradient sensitivity", increasing with higher tensile strength. For tool steel SUJ2 (Rm=2200MPa), q=0.98, while for S45C (Rm=700MPa), q=0.75, resulting in Kf differences from 1.5 to 2.1 for a notch depth of 1mm and r=0.5mm.

      Notch Fatigue (Notch Effect) in Practice

      Notch Fatigue in Practice

      ๐ŸŽ“

      Essential for fatigue evaluation of bolt holes, fillets, keyways, and weld toes.


      Practical Checklist

      ๐ŸŽ“
      • [ ] Is the FEM mesh at the notch sufficient? (Element size โ‰ค fillet radius/3)
      • [ ] Has mesh convergence been verified? (Notch stress change within 5%)
      • [ ] Is it clear whether to use Neuber's rule or direct elastoplastic?
      • [ ] Does the $K_f$ calculation consider $q$ (notch sensitivity)?

      • Coffee Break Yomoyama Talk

        Crack Prevention Measures for Press Dies

        Fatigue failure at notch areas (corner R) in press dies directly leads to production stoppage. In practice, ensure a minimum curvature radius rโ‰ฅ0.5mm, verify stress concentration at the notch root via FEM, then perform life evaluation using the Kf method. Denso Corporation standardized FEM + notch fatigue analysis in die design around 2015, improving die life by 1.5x compared to conventional methods.

        Notch Fatigue (Notch Effect): Software & Solver Comparison

        Tools

        ๐ŸŽ“
        • nCode DesignLife โ€” Supports Neuber's rule. Standard for notch fatigue.
        • fe-safe โ€” Supports Neuber/Glinka.
        • Peterson's SCF Charts โ€” Reference values for $K_t$.

        • Coffee Break Yomoyama Talk

          Simulation Driven Design with OptiStruct

          Altair OptiStruct has a Fatigue Quick Setup feature that automatically calculates Kf for notch fatigue evaluation. Through collaboration with HBM-Prenscia, it directly links with fe-safe, enabling fatigue evaluation of all components including notches in suspension arm shapes in a single flow. BMW shortened the design verification period for a new suspension by 3 months using this flow.

          Advanced Technology

          Advanced Notch Fatigue (Notch Effect): Modern Research & Trends in Notch Fatigue

          ๐ŸŽ“
          • TCD (Theory of Critical Distances) โ€” Evaluation based on stress at a certain distance from the notch tip.
          • Gradient Effect โ€” Fatigue limit increases with steeper stress gradients.
          • Notch Stress Intensity Factor โ€” Integration of stress concentration and fracture mechanics.

          • Coffee Break Yomoyama Talk

            Taylor's Theory at the Notch Tip

            Taylor's cylinder (critical distance) theory evaluates fatigue based on stress at a point distance L away from the notch tip. L is material-dependent, approximately 0.1mm for high-strength steel, 0.1~1mm for cast iron. More accurate than traditional evaluation using total stress concentration, and its concept is incorporated into ASTM E739.

            Notch Fatigue (Notch Effect): Common Issues & Debugging

            Notch Fatigue Troubleshooting

            ๐ŸŽ“
            • Notch stress is mesh-dependent โ†’ Verify mesh convergence. Elements โ‰ค fillet R/3.
            • $K_t$ doesn't match Peterson values โ†’ Effect of finite plate size. FEM $K_t$ is for a finite body.
            • Fatigue life is underestimated โ†’ $K_f < K_t$. Correct with notch sensitivity $q$.

            • Coffee Break Yomoyama Talk

              Discrepancy Between FEM Stress Concentration and Actual Measured Life

              When there's a large difference between Kt calculated by FEM and Kf obtained from tests, surface roughness effects are suspect. For turned surfaces (Ra=1.6ฮผm), finishing

              Related Simulators

              Experience the theory firsthand with the interactive simulator for this field

              All Simulators

              Related fields

              Thermal AnalysisManufacturing Process AnalysisV&V ยท Quality Assurance
              Rate this article
              Thank you for your feedback!
              Helpful
              More details
              Report error
              Helpful
              0
              More details
              0
              Report error
              0
              Written by NovaSolver Contributors
              Anonymous Engineers & AI โ€” Sitemap
              About the Authors