Fatigue Evaluation of Welded Joints

Category: Structural Analysis | Integrated 2026-04-06
CAE visualization for weld fatigue theory - technical simulation diagram
Fatigue Assessment of Welded Joints

Fatigue Evaluation of Welded Joints: Theoretical Foundations

Fatigue of Welded Joints

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

Professor, are welded joints weak against fatigue?


๐ŸŽ“

Welded joints have significantly lower fatigue life than the base material due to , stress concentration, and welding defects (blowholes, undercut). The majority of fatigue failures in steel structures occur at the weld toe.


Welding Fatigue Assessment Methods

๐ŸŽ“
MethodStress DefinitionCharacteristics
Nominal Stress MethodAverage stress over the cross-sectionSimplest. Design codes (EN 1993-1-9, IIW)
Hot Spot Stress MethodStructural stress at the weld toeExtrapolation from FEM results. Mesh-insensitive
Notch Stress MethodNotch stress at the weld toe ($R_{ref} = 1$ mm)Most detailed. FEM-dependent
Crack Propagation MethodStress Intensity FactorLife of existing cracks. Influence of welding defects
๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

The Hot Spot Stress Method is an intermediate approach.


๐ŸŽ“

Extrapolate FEM results from positions 0.4t and 1.0t ($t$: plate thickness) away from the weld toe to estimate the structural stress at the toe. Independent of mesh size (with consistent extrapolation rules). Recommended by IIW.


Summary

๐ŸŽ“
  • Weld toe is the origin of fatigue failure โ€” + Stress concentration + Defects
  • Nominal Stress โ†’ Hot Spot โ†’ Notch Stress โ€” Hierarchy of detail
  • IIW (International Institute of Welding) FAT Classification โ€” S-N curves for welded joints
  • Evaluate Hot Spot Stress with FEM โ€” Mesh-insensitive extrapolation rules

  • Coffee Break Yomoyama Talk

    Liberty Ship Welding Cracks and Fatigue

    During World War II, serious cracks occurred in about 400 out of 2710 American Liberty ships, with dozens breaking in half at sea. One cause was the combination of fatigue at welded joints and low-temperature brittleness. Subsequent research revealed that stress concentration factors Kt=2~3 occur at weld bead toe ends, which became the origin of the IIW welding fatigue design standards.

    Computational Methods for Fatigue Evaluation of Welded Joints

    FEM for Welding Fatigue

    ๐ŸŽ“

    FEM procedure for the Hot Spot Stress Method:

    1. Model the welded structure with shell elements (mid-surface of plate thickness)

    2. Read stresses at positions 0.4t and 1.0t from the weld toe

    3. Estimate structural stress at the toe by linear extrapolation

    4. Perform life assessment using IIW FAT classification S-N curves


    Notch Stress Method

    ๐ŸŽ“

    IIW Effective Notch Stress Method: Assign a virtual notch radius of $R_{ref} = 1$ mm (for steel) to the weld toe and weld root, calculate the notch stress via FEM. Perform unified assessment with the FAT225 S-N curve.


    Summary

    ๐ŸŽ“
    • Hot Spot Method โ€” Extrapolation from 0.4t, 1.0t. Mesh size $t \times t$ recommended
    • Effective Notch Method โ€” $R_{ref} = 1$ mm + FAT225
    • IIW FAT Classification โ€” Catalog of S-N curves for welded joints

    • Coffee Break Yomoyama Talk

      How to Use the Hot Spot Stress Method

      Widely used in welding fatigue assessment, the Hot Spot Stress Method obtains the hot spot stress by linearly extrapolating surface stresses from two points at 0.4t and 1.0t (t is plate thickness) from the weld toe. This stress is compared with S-N curves from IIW-specified FAT classes (e.g., FAT90). Since the extrapolation interval setting greatly affects results, a mesh size of t/4 or less is recommended.

      Fatigue Evaluation of Welded Joints in Practice

      Welding Fatigue in Practice

      ๐ŸŽ“

      Essential for steel structures like bridges, ships, cranes, pressure vessels, and offshore structures.


      Examples of IIW FAT Classification

      ๐ŸŽ“
      Joint TypeFAT (N/mmยฒ)
      Base Material (ground surface)FAT 160
      Butt Weld (weld reinforcement removed)FAT 112
      Butt Weld (with weld reinforcement)FAT 90
      Fillet Weld (cruciform joint)FAT 71
      Non-Load Bearing Fillet WeldFAT 80

      FAT = Stress range $\Delta\sigma$ causing failure at 2ร—10โถ cycles.


      Practical Checklist

      ๐ŸŽ“
      • [ ] Does the welded joint FAT classification comply with IIW/EN 1993-1-9?
      • [ ] Are the hot spot stress extrapolation positions correct? (0.4t, 1.0t)
      • [ ] Is the mesh size $t \times t$ or smaller? (Hot Spot Method)
      • [ ] Has the influence of welding residual stress been considered? (e.g., assuming R-ratio = 0.5)

      • Coffee Break Yomoyama Talk

        20-Year Life Verification for Ship Hull Welding Fatigue

        DNVGL (Det Norske Veritas Germanischer Lloyd) design rules require assessing the fatigue life of ship hull welded joints for 20 years. Under North Sea wave spectrum (Hs=3m) loading cycles reach about 10โธ over 20 years, making ฮ”ฯƒ=71MPa the fatigue limit for FAT71 class welds. The FEM direct hot spot assessment method, popular since the 2000s, has significantly improved assessment accuracy.

        Fatigue Evaluation of Welded Joints: Software & Solver Comparison

        Welding Fatigue Tools

        ๐ŸŽ“
        • nCode DesignLife โ€” Supports Hot Spot and Notch Stress Methods
        • FEMFAT weld โ€” Dedicated welding fatigue module. For automotive BIW
        • fe-safe โ€” Supports welding fatigue
        • Ansys Fatigue + Weld โ€” Workbench GUI

        • Selection Guide

          ๐ŸŽ“
          • Automotive BIW Welding โ†’ FEMFAT weld
          • General Welding Fatigue โ†’ nCode DesignLife

          • Related Simulators

            Experience the theory firsthand with the interactive simulator for this field

            All Simulators

            Related fields

            Thermal AnalysisManufacturing Process AnalysisV&V ยท Quality Assurance
            Rate this article
            Thank you for your feedback!
            Helpful
            More details
            Report error
            Helpful
            0
            More details
            0
            Report error
            0
            Written by NovaSolver Contributors
            Anonymous Engineers & AI โ€” Sitemap
            About the Authors