Gurson Model (Ductile Fracture)

Category: Structural Analysis | Integrated 2026-04-06
CAE visualization for gurson model theory - technical simulation diagram
Gurson Model (Ductile Fracture)

Gurson Model (Ductile Fracture): Theoretical Foundations

What is the Gurson Model?

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

Professor, is the Gurson model a model for ductile fracture?


๐ŸŽ“

Gurson Model (1977) describes the ductile fracture (void nucleation, growth, coalescence) of metals. The volume fraction $f$ of internal micro-voids affects the material's yield condition.


$$ \Phi = \left(\frac{q}{\sigma_0}\right)^2 + 2q_1 f^* \cosh\left(\frac{3q_2 p}{2\sigma_0}\right) - 1 - (q_1 f^*)^2 = 0 $$

๐Ÿง‘โ€๐ŸŽ“

The void volume fraction $f$ is included in the yield surface!


๐ŸŽ“

As $f$ increases, the yield surface contracts โ†’ material softens โ†’ eventually fractures at $f = f_F$. It represents material degradation at the continuum level due to void growth.


GTN Model (Modified Gurson)

๐ŸŽ“

Tvergaard and Needleman (1984) modified Gurson's model to create the practical GTN (Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman) Model. They added correction parameters $q_1, q_2, q_3$.


Summary

๐ŸŽ“
  • Ductile fracture via void nucleation โ†’ growth โ†’ coalescence โ€” Based on micromechanics
  • $f$ (void volume fraction) affects the yield surface โ€” Softening with increasing $f$
  • GTN Model โ€” Modified version. $q_1 \approx 1.5, q_2 \approx 1.0$
  • Fracture prediction in sheet metal forming, ductile fracture of pressure vessels โ€” Main applications

  • Coffee Break Yomoyama Talk

    The Doctoral Thesis Origin of the Gurson Model

    Arthur L. Gurson first published his model for ductile fracture via void growth in his 1975 Brown University doctoral thesis titled "Plastic Flow and Fracture Behavior of Ductile Materials Incorporating Void Nucleation, Growth, and Coalescence." The 1977 paper published in the Journal of Engineering Materials and Technology analytically derived the yield function from the upper bound theorem for porous metals containing spherical voids. This rigorous mechanical derivation is a major feature of the Gurson model.

    Computational Methods for Gurson Model (Ductile Fracture)

    GTN in FEM

    ๐ŸŽ“

    ```

    *POROUS METAL PLASTICITY

    q1, q2, q3

    *POROUS FAILURE CRITERIA

    f_N, epsilon_N, s_N, f_0, f_c, f_F

    ```

    LS-DYNA: *MAT_120 (GTN).


    Summary

    ๐ŸŽ“
    • Abaqus *POROUS METAL PLASTICITY โ€” GTN model
    • LS-DYNA *MAT_120 โ€” GTN implementation
    • Parameters: $q_1, q_2, f_0, f_c, f_F, f_N, \varepsilon_N, s_N$ โ€” Calibrated from tests

    • Coffee Break Yomoyama Talk

      GTN Extensions and Tvergaard Constants

      The Gurson model evolved into the GTN model (Gurson-Tvergaard-Needleman) when Tvergaard (1981) introduced empirical correction coefficients qโ‚, qโ‚‚, qโ‚ƒ. Typical values are qโ‚=1.5, qโ‚‚=1.0, qโ‚ƒ=qโ‚ยฒ=2.25, widely applied to Aluminum and Steel. Furthermore, Needleman & Tvergaard (1984) added the "critical void fraction f*" and a fracture acceleration function, resulting in the current standard GTN model form capable of representing rapid ductile fracture (void coalescence).

      Gurson Model (Ductile Fracture) in Practice

      GTN in Practice

      ๐ŸŽ“

      Used for fracture prediction in sheet metal forming, ductile tearing of nuclear pressure vessels, and ductile fracture of pipelines.


      Practical Checklist

      ๐ŸŽ“
      • [ ] Are GTN parameters calibrated from material tests (tensile + notched tensile)?
      • [ ] Is the initial void fraction $f_0$ reasonable? (Steel: $f_0 = 0.001 \sim 0.01$)
      • [ ] Are the critical void fraction $f_c$ and fracture void fraction $f_F$ appropriate?
      • [ ] Pay attention to mesh dependency (consider regularization like non-local models).

      • Coffee Break Yomoyama Talk

        Ductile Rupture Analysis of Oil Pipelines

        The Gurson model is utilized in burst test analysis for oil and gas pipelines conforming to API 5L standards. DNV-ST-F101 (subsea pipeline standard) recognizes the complementary use of virtual experiments using the GTN model for the two-stage evaluation of plastic collapse and ductile rupture, positioning it as a tool to reduce the number of actual hydrostatic burst tests (costing tens of millions of yen each). Its effectiveness has been confirmed particularly in rupture evaluation of high-strength steel grades X80 and X100.

        Gurson Model (Ductile Fracture): Software & Solver Comparison

        Tools

        ๐ŸŽ“
        • Abaqus *POROUS METAL PLASTICITY โ€” GTN. Research standard.
        • LS-DYNA *MAT_120 โ€” GTN.
        • Johnson-Cook Fracture โ€” Simpler than GTN but widely used.

        • Coffee Break Yomoyama Talk

          Comparison of Abaqus GTN and LS-DYNA MAT224

          In Abaqus, the GTN model is defined with the "POROUS METAL PLASTICITY" keyword, directly inputting qโ‚, qโ‚‚, fโ‚€, f_N, etc. In LS-DYNA, equivalent functionality is implemented as MAT_GURSON (Material 120), and since 2020, MAT_MODIFIED_GURSON (Material 220) has been added, providing full GTN extension capabilities. HyperWorks/OptiStruct also began supporting GTN materials in 2022, offering the unique feature of coupling topology optimization with ductile fracture evaluation.

          Related Topics

          Related Simulators

          Experience the theory firsthand with the interactive simulator for this field

          All Simulators

          Related fields

          Thermal AnalysisManufacturing Process AnalysisV&V ยท Quality Assurance
          Rate this article
          Thank you for your feedback!
          Helpful
          More details
          Report error
          Helpful
          0
          More details
          0
          Report error
          0
          Written by NovaSolver Contributors
          Anonymous Engineers & AI โ€” Sitemap
          About the Authors