Back

Coil inductance

Change diameter, length and turns to explore inductance and stored energy.

mm
mm
Cycles
—
A
kHz
Calculation Results
—
Inductance L (μH)
—
Number of Turns N
—
Core Relative Permeability μr
—
Stored energy ½LI² (mJ)
—
Magnetic flux density B (mT)
—
Reactance Xₗ (Ω)
—
L(Wheeler)(μH)
—
Nagaoka coefficient Kₙ
See the field behind the geometry

Drag to rotate. Trace the graph below to locate the same axial point in 3D.

Teal: field streamlines of a finite air-core model. Fixed seeds are used; line count and spacing do not measure flux density. At most 90 representative windings are drawn.

Teal: field streamlines of a finite air-core model. Fixed seeds are used; line count and spacing do not measure flux density. At most 90 representative windings are drawn.

Magnetic field along the axis

Solid: finite length · Dashed: long-solenoid limit · Amber: coil region

Model and experiment

The winding is modeled as a thin, uniformly distributed cylindrical current sheet in air. The axial field integrates the circular-loop formula over the coil length. Streamlines use azimuthal numerical integration of the Biot–Savart law; the singular region near the winding is omitted. This is not finite-element, magnetic-core, saturation or high-frequency analysis. Frequency still affects the existing reactance result, not this magnetostatic view.

Try the air-core preset (D=30 mm, l=50 mm, N=50, I=1 A): about 1.078 mT at the center versus 1.257 mT in the long-solenoid approximation. Their ratio approaches one as length becomes much larger than diameter. The existing B card uses the long-solenoid approximation with the selected permeability; it is distinct from the new finite air-core field.

Background: circular loops and solenoids
Coil, Current & Magnetic Field — Schematic View

Dots illustrate current and curves illustrate the magnetic field schematically. Their number, shape and speed are not calculated field distributions or electron velocities. At fixed geometry and μr, L is proportional to N² and does not change with current I. Current changes the long-solenoid estimate B and stored energy E; frequency f changes XL. This constant-μr ideal model does not calculate core saturation or frequency-dependent material properties.

Inductance L vs Number of Turns N
Inductance L vs coil diameter D
Theory & Key Formulas
$$L = \mu_0\mu_r \frac{\pi D^2}{4}\frac{N^2}{l}K_n$$

Long-solenoid approximation ($K_n\to1$). $L$ is proportional to the square of the number of turns $N^2$ and the core relative permeability $\mu_r$, and inversely proportional to length $l$.

$$\begin{gathered}B = \mu_0\mu_r \frac{N I}{l}\\ E = \tfrac{1}{2}L I^2\\ X_L = 2\pi f L\end{gathered}$$

$B$ = on-axis magnetic flux density, $E$ = stored energy, $X_L$ = inductive reactance.

Wheeler-type SI approximation (not a uniform accuracy guarantee):

$$L \approx \mu_0\mu_r\frac{\pi r^2 N^2}{l + 0.9r}$$

$K_n$ is the finite-length correction factor (Hantaro Nagaoka, 1909), given exactly in terms of the elliptic integrals $K(k),E(k)$.

How to use & worked examples

Enter mean winding diameter D and winding length l in mm, turns N, constant relative permeability μr, current I in A and frequency f in kHz. Use μr=1 for an air core.

Air core, 50 turns

D=10 mm, l=20 mm, N=50, μr=1, I=1 A, f=100 kHz: Kn≈0.8181, L≈10.093 μH, E≈0.0050 mJ and XL≈6.34 Ω. The Wheeler-type estimate is about 10.071 μH.

Double the turns

Keeping the other inputs fixed, N=100 gives L≈40.373 μH, E≈0.0202 mJ and XL≈25.37 Ω: four times the inductance. Doubling only I leaves L unchanged, doubles B and quadruples E.

Model & applicability

L=μ0μrπ(D/2)²N²Kn/l, with lengths converted to m and L displayed in μH. Kn is the finite-length correction for an ideal cylindrical current sheet, evaluated with elliptic integrals. The comparison uses the SI Wheeler-type approximation L≈μ0μrπr²N²/(l+0.9r), not a uniform error guarantee across all inputs. B=μ0μrNI/l is a long-solenoid estimate; E=LI²/2 and XL=2πfL.

References

NIST — Grover: single-layer solenoids (PDF)

Explanation and examples checked: 9 September 2026

Open calculator ↑

Frequently asked questions

Does the finite-length correction guarantee a measured value?

No. It corrects an ideal current-sheet model, not wire diameter, winding pitch, resistance, parasitic capacitance or self-resonance in a real coil.

Can I design a magnetic core by entering its nominal μr?

No. μr is a constant multiplier here. The model does not solve the magnetic path, air gap, demagnetization, saturation or frequency-dependent permeability.

Why does L stay unchanged when current or frequency changes?

In this linear model, geometry, turns and μr determine L. Current changes B and E; frequency changes XL. Saturation and high-frequency changes in L are outside the model.