Coil Inductance Calculator Back

Coil Inductance Calculator | Nagaoka and Wheeler Methods

Calculate coil inductance from diameter, length and turns, and compare Nagaoka and Wheeler methods. Explore idealized permeability, current, stored energy and frequency-dependent inductive reactance.

mm
mm
Cycles
A
kHz
Inductance L vs Number of Turns N
Inductance L (μH)
Number of Turns N
Core Relative Permeability μr
Stored energy ½LI² (mJ)
Magnetic flux density B (mT)
Reactance Xₗ (Ω)
L(Wheeler)(μH)
Nagaoka coefficient Kₙ
Inductance L vs Coil Diameter D

Blue dots = current flowing through the coil. Green curves = magnetic field lines threading the coil. Increasing turns N, current I, or core μr makes the field lines denser and shows inductance L∝N²μr increasing.

Theory & Key Formulas
Inductance L vs coil diameter D
Theory & Key Formulas
$$L = \mu_0\mu_r \frac{\pi D^2}{4}\frac{N^2}{l}K_n$$

Long-solenoid approximation ($K_n\to1$). $L$ is proportional to the square of the number of turns $N^2$ and the core relative permeability $\mu_r$, and inversely proportional to length $l$.

$$B = \mu_0\mu_r \frac{N I}{l},\qquad E = \tfrac{1}{2}L I^2,\qquad X_L = 2\pi f L$$

$B$ = on-axis magnetic flux density, $E$ = stored energy, $X_L$ = inductive reactance.

Wheeler approximation (error ≤ 1% within its practical range):

$$L \approx \mu_0\mu_r\frac{\pi r^2 N^2}{l + 0.9r}$$

$K_n$ is the finite-length correction factor (Hantaro Nagaoka, 1909), given exactly in terms of the elliptic integrals $K(k),E(k)$.

TRY THE SAME CONDITIONS

Worked example

To try a diameter of 10mm and length of 20mm, enter 10 and 20, not 0.01 and 0.02. Keep geometry and permeability fixed: increasing turns from 50 to 100 makes inductance four times larger.

Calculator ↑

Model and scope

L=μ0μr(πD²/4)N²Kn/l. Dimensions are entered in mm, converted internally to m, and inductance is displayed in μH. Energy E=LI²/2 and reactance XL=2πfL. Frequency input is in kHz. The magnetic-flux-density display uses a long-solenoid approximation.

Questions and answers

Is the Nagaoka result an exact prediction of a physical coil?

No. It corrects an idealized finite-length winding model. Real conductor dimensions, winding arrangement, parasitic capacitance and losses are not all included.

Can I design a magnetic core simply by entering μr?

The μr input is a constant multiplier in a linear ideal model. It does not solve gaps, magnetic path, demagnetizing effects, saturation or frequency dependence. A material's nominal μr alone is insufficient.

Why do current and frequency not change L?

In this linear model L depends on geometry, turns and μr. Current changes field and stored energy; frequency changes reactance and visualization. Saturation-dependent inductance is not modeled.

How should I use the Wheeler comparison?

Compare the approximations at identical dimensions and turns. Agreement does not certify physical accuracy. Short coils and high-frequency use require separate checks for winding geometry, self-resonance and losses.

Theory reference (not certification of this tool)

NIST: Grover, single-layer solenoids (PDF)

Explanation updated: 6 September 2026