Back
FATIGUE ANALYSIS

S-N Curve & Fatigue Life Estimator

Input material S-N curve and endurance limit to estimate fatigue life in real time using Basquin's equation. Adjust stress amplitude, mean stress, and Goodman correction to verify safety factors.

S-N Curve Fatigue Life Estimation Tool

Material Class

Material Strength

Correction Factors

Loading Conditions

Formulas

Fatigue Test Live — cyclic loading until the specimen fails
Speed 1.0×
Results
Fatigue Life N_f
cycles
Modified Endurance Limit S_e'
MPa (ka·kb·kc·Se)
Safety Factor n = S_e'/σ_a
safety factor
1. S-N Diagram (Log-Log) — Basquin's Law + Endurance Limit + Operating Point
2. Correction Factor Effect: Original Curve (Dashed) vs. Modified (Solid)
3. Fatigue Life Scatter Band (±2σ)
Key Formulas
$S_e' = k_a k_b k_c S_e$
$\sigma_a = \sigma_f'\!(2N)^b$
$N_f = \tfrac{1}{2}\!\left(\dfrac{\sigma_a}{\sigma_f'}\right)^{1/b}$

What is Fatigue Life & the S-N Curve?

🙋
What exactly is an S-N curve? I've heard it's about predicting when a material will break, but that sounds like it should be a single number, not a curve.
🎓
Great question! Basically, an S-N curve (Stress vs. Number of cycles) shows that a material's failure point isn't fixed. It depends on how many times you load and unload it. For instance, a steel beam might hold 500 MPa once, but fail at just 300 MPa if that load is applied a million times. In the simulator above, you can see this relationship directly by moving the Stress Amplitude slider—watch how the predicted life changes dramatically.
🙋
Wait, really? So if I lower the stress just a little, the part could last millions more cycles? That seems like a huge sensitivity.
🎓
Exactly right! That's the core insight of fatigue. A common case is an aircraft wing: tiny vibrations at high stress cause cracks quickly, but if you reduce the stress amplitude, the same wing can last the plane's entire lifetime. Try it here: set a high stress amplitude and note the low cycle life. Then, nudge the slider down slightly and see the cycle count jump—this is the power of the S-N relationship.
🙋
Okay, but the simulator also has a "Mean Stress" slider. What's that for? Isn't it just the alternating stress that matters?
🎓
Ah, a crucial detail! The mean stress—the average stress during the cycle—matters a lot. In practice, a bolt being tightened (high mean stress) and then vibrated will fail much faster than one just vibrating around zero. The tool uses the Goodman correction to combine your mean stress and stress amplitude into one "equivalent" fully reversed stress. Adjust both sliders and see how a positive mean stress lowers the effective fatigue strength.

Physical Model & Key Equations

The foundation of high-cycle fatigue analysis is the Basquin equation, which models the linear region of the S-N curve on a log-log scale.

$$ \sigma_a = \sigma_f' (2N_f)^b $$

Here, $\sigma_a$ is the stress amplitude (the alternating stress you input). $\sigma_f'$ is the fatigue strength coefficient , a material property. $N_f$ is the number of cycles to failure (the output you're estimating). $b$ is the fatigue strength exponent, a negative number that defines the slope of the S-N curve.

Since real loading often has a non-zero mean stress ($\sigma_m$), the Basquin equation is used with an equivalent stress. A common model is the Goodman correction, which reduces the allowable alternating stress as the mean stress increases.

$$ \sigma_{a,eq}= \frac{\sigma_a}{1 - (\sigma_m / \sigma_{uts})}$$

Here, $\sigma_{a,eq}$ is the equivalent fully reversed stress amplitude used in the Basquin equation. $\sigma_m$ is the mean stress. $\sigma_{uts}$ is the material's ultimate tensile strength. This equation shows that as the mean stress approaches the ultimate strength, the allowable alternating stress drops to zero—meaning even a tiny vibration would cause immediate failure.

Real-World Applications

Aerospace Component Design: Every bolt, bracket, and panel in an aircraft undergoes millions of stress cycles from take-off, turbulence, and landing. Engineers use S-N curves with high safety factors to ensure wings and engine mounts won't develop fatigue cracks before the next major inspection, often after tens of thousands of flight hours.

Automotive Suspension & Axles: A car's suspension springs and axles experience cyclic loading from every bump in the road. Fatigue analysis determines the right material and thickness so these components last for the vehicle's target lifespan (e.g., 150,000 miles) without catastrophic failure, balancing performance with durability.

Wind Turbine Blade Engineering: Turbine blades flex with every rotation and wind gust, causing complex cyclic stresses. Predicting fatigue life is critical for these massive, expensive structures located in remote or offshore sites, ensuring they operate reliably for 20+ years with minimal maintenance.

Medical Implants (e.g., Hip Stems): A hip replacement stem is loaded with every step the patient takes—over a million cycles per year. The S-N curve, adjusted for the body's corrosive environment, is used to select titanium alloys and designs that will not fatigue and fracture inside the patient's body over decades of use.

Common Misconceptions and Points to Note

First, understand that "the S-N curve is not an absolute performance chart for a material." You often see references stating "the S-N curve for SUP9 is this," but this is data from test specimens with ideal shape, surface, and environment. For actual components, the correction factors your senior colleague mentioned are what matter. For example, even at the same stress amplitude of 100 MPa, the fatigue life can differ by more than a factor of 10 between a mirror-polished part and one with an as-machined surface. You'll see the curve drop sharply if you change the surface finish factor in the tool to "rough machined surface." That's reality.

Next, the influence of mean stress is often overlooked. This tool assumes "fully reversed loading (mean stress = 0)," but in practice, fluctuating loading (e.g., repeated loading only in tension) is more common. When mean stress is present, the fatigue life can change significantly even at the same stress amplitude. For instance, the presence of a mean tensile stress accelerates failure. Be careful, as evaluating this requires different methods like the "Goodman diagram."

Finally, avoid overconfidence that "infinite life means it will never fail." While it's true that failure is unlikely under high-cycle fatigue below the fatigue limit, the story changes if there's a corrosive environment or even a single unexpected overload. Furthermore, it is now known that failure can occur in the "very high cycle fatigue regime" beyond 10^7 cycles. A safety factor of 1.5 is merely a starting point for design. Prototype durability testing under real operating conditions is an absolutely indispensable step.

How to Use

  1. Enter ultimate tensile strength (Su) in MPa—typical values: 400 MPa for mild steel, 1000 MPa for high-strength alloy
  2. Input endurance limit (Se) in MPa, often 0.5×Su for ferrous materials or look up material datasheet
  3. Set the S-N curve slope exponent (b), typically -0.05 to -0.15 for metals; negative value indicates fatigue strength decreases with cycle count
  4. Specify stress amplitude (S) in MPa and desired cycles (N) to solve for life or stress
  5. Click Calculate to generate the fitted Basquin equation and predict failure cycles

Worked Example

For 4340 steel with Su=1200 MPa, estimated Se=600 MPa (50% rule), and b=-0.10: applying cyclic stress of 800 MPa yields approximately 1,700 cycles to failure (via N = 0.5(σa/σf')^(1/b) with σf' = 1.5·Su = 1800 MPa). At 650 MPa stress, life extends to roughly 13,000 cycles. The S-N curve displays the characteristic knee where stresses below Se theoretically provide infinite life; industrial designs target stress amplitudes 40-60% of Su to achieve 10^7 cycle endurance.

Practical Notes

  1. Haigh diagram correction: reduce Se by 10-20% for surface finish if using ground/polished vs. as-rolled material
  2. Size effect matters—components under 50 mm diameter show higher endurance; apply size factor Kd=0.9 for 100 mm shafts
  3. Temperature derating required above 250°C for steel; endurance limit drops ~0.5% per 50°C increase
  4. Mean stress (Goodman or Morrow correction) shifts the S-N curve downward—critical for designs with non-zero mean loads

Standards & Assumptions

Standard/formula: Basquin's law (stress-life) σa = σf'(2Nf)^b ⇒ Nf = ½(σa/σf')^(1/b); the log-log S-N regression is the same line as ASTM E739. Fatigue strength coefficient σf' ≈ 1.5·Su (Shigley approx for steel). Endurance-limit modifiers Se' = ka·kb·kc·Se (Marin factors). Mean-stress correction Goodman: σar = σa/(1 − σm/Su), σm = σa(1+R)/(1−R).

Assumptions: high-cycle, constant-amplitude, uniaxial stress. Verification confirms exact Basquin round-trips (Nf=1e3–1e6), Goodman leaves R=−1 unchanged and maps σa=200→σar=300 at R=0 (Su=600); the default Basquin exponent b=−0.085 lies in the typical steel band [−0.05, −0.15].

Scope & limits: representative for smooth specimens; notch factor Kf, detailed surface state, environment (corrosion/temperature), variable-amplitude cumulative damage (Miner's rule) and multiaxiality must be considered separately. σf'≈1.5Su is an approximation that varies by material.