Analysis of Heat Generation in Eddy Current Brakes

Category: Coupled Analysis – Electromagnetic-Thermal | Revised 2026-10-01

Theory: eddy currents brake and become heat

Overview

🙋

Roller coasters slow down with magnetic brakes at the end. Do they brake harder the faster they go?

🎓

Up to a point, yes. A conducting fin moving in a field carries eddy currents whose force with the field opposes motion. At low speed eddy currents grow with speed, so braking force is proportional to speed. At higher speed the eddy currents' own field pushes the applied field out of the fin, so force levels off and then falls; the crossover speed depends on the fin's conductivity and thickness. All kinetic energy removed becomes heat in the fin, and as the fin heats its conductivity drops, changing braking behaviour. Hence electromagnetic and thermal effects are evaluated together.

Speed and braking force

$$ F_{lin} = c_e\,\sigma\,d\,B^2 A\,v,\qquad R_m = \mu_0\sigma v d,\qquad v_c = \frac{1}{\mu_0\sigma d},\qquad F(v) \approx \frac{F_{lin}(v)}{1 + (v/v_c)^2} $$

σ is fin conductivity, d fin thickness (5 mm), B flux density (0.3 T), A pole area (0.01 m²) and c_e a correction for fin edges and current return paths (0.5). The last formula is a simple approximation bridging low-speed proportionality and high-speed decline.

Peak force and temperature rise

$$ F_{max} = \frac{c_e B^2 A}{2\mu_0}\ (\text{independent of }\sigma),\qquad \Delta T = \frac{\tfrac12 m_v v_0^2}{m_f c_p} $$
Coffee Break Trivia

Foucault's eddy currents

The braking of moving conductors by induced currents was found by Arago in 1824, who saw a compass needle dragged by a spinning copper disc; in 1855 Foucault showed that a copper disc spun in a magnetic field heats up, which is why eddy currents are also called Foucault currents. In the 20th century they served as auxiliary brakes on trains and trucks; recently, being wear-free and unaffected by rain, they are widely used on amusement rides and high-speed rail.

Worked examples

Example 1: braking force by speed, material and temperature (per magnet pair)

FinCritical speed v_c1 m/s2 m/s5 m/s10 m/s25 m/s
Aluminium 20 °C4.55 m/s75 N132 N178 N135 N63 N
Aluminium 100 °C6.12 m/s57 N106 N175 N159 N83 N
Copper 20 °C2.74 m/s115 N170 N151 N91 N39 N

Peak force (about 179 N) in this approximation is independent of conductivity, set by field and area.

Example 2: heat from stopping a vehicle

ItemValue
Vehicle mass and speed5 t, 25 m/s
Kinetic energy1.56 MJ
Temperature rise of a 50 kg aluminium finabout 35 K
Braking power per pair at 25 m/s1.6 kW
🙋

Copper conducts better, yet aluminium brakes harder at speed.

🎓

Better conductors carry stronger eddy currents whose field expels the applied field more effectively, so force levels off at a lower speed v_c. Copper peaks at 2.7 m/s and aluminium at 4.6 m/s, so above that copper's force falls sooner. For braking from high speed, as on roller coasters, aluminium or thinner fins are better; for strong braking at low speed, copper or thicker fins. Temperature works the same way: hotter aluminium conducts less, reducing low-speed force but increasing high-speed force. Repeated stops heat the fin and change braking, so continuous operation calls for coupled electromagnetic–thermal tracking of temperature and force.

Analysis workflow

  1. Use the magnetic Reynolds number to judge whether field expulsion matters.
  2. Compute eddy currents and force with electromagnetic analysis including moving conductors (moving frame or motion terms).
  3. Pass Joule heat to thermal analysis for fin temperature rise and cooling.
  4. Update conductivity with temperature and track force over repeated stops.
  5. Also check magnet demagnetisation from temperature rise.
Coffee Break Trivia

“Not stopping fully on summer afternoons”

On one ride's eddy-current brake, crowded summer afternoons saw cars fail to stop at the set point, with the auxiliary brake acting more often. Continuous operation heated the aluminium fins, lowering conductivity and reducing force in the latter, low-speed part of the brake zone. Coupled electromagnetic–thermal analysis reproduced the stopping point extending once fins exceeded 70 °C. Thicker fins with more cooling area limited the temperature rise and stabilised stopping.

Common mistakes

Mistakes and fixes

MistakeEffectFix
Assuming force always ∝ speedHigh-speed force overestimatedCheck Rm
Constant conductivityContinuous-use drift missedUpdate with temperature
Infinite-sheet formula as isForce overestimatedAnalyse edge effects
Expecting it to stop at low speedDoesn't fully stopAdd another brake
Ignoring magnet temperatureForce loss from demagnetisationCheck magnet temperature
🙋

I'd like to learn related topics.

Related Simulators

Experience the theory through interactive simulators in this field

All Simulators

Related fields

Structural AnalysisElectromagnetic AnalysisThermal Analysis
Rate this article
Thank you for your feedback!
Helpful
More details
Report error
Helpful
0
More details
0
Report error
0