Analysis of Heat Generation in Eddy Current Brakes
Theory: eddy currents brake and become heat
Overview
Roller coasters slow down with magnetic brakes at the end. Do they brake harder the faster they go?
Up to a point, yes. A conducting fin moving in a field carries eddy currents whose force with the field opposes motion. At low speed eddy currents grow with speed, so braking force is proportional to speed. At higher speed the eddy currents' own field pushes the applied field out of the fin, so force levels off and then falls; the crossover speed depends on the fin's conductivity and thickness. All kinetic energy removed becomes heat in the fin, and as the fin heats its conductivity drops, changing braking behaviour. Hence electromagnetic and thermal effects are evaluated together.
Speed and braking force
σ is fin conductivity, d fin thickness (5 mm), B flux density (0.3 T), A pole area (0.01 m²) and c_e a correction for fin edges and current return paths (0.5). The last formula is a simple approximation bridging low-speed proportionality and high-speed decline.
Peak force and temperature rise
Foucault's eddy currents
The braking of moving conductors by induced currents was found by Arago in 1824, who saw a compass needle dragged by a spinning copper disc; in 1855 Foucault showed that a copper disc spun in a magnetic field heats up, which is why eddy currents are also called Foucault currents. In the 20th century they served as auxiliary brakes on trains and trucks; recently, being wear-free and unaffected by rain, they are widely used on amusement rides and high-speed rail.
Worked examples
Example 1: braking force by speed, material and temperature (per magnet pair)
| Fin | Critical speed v_c | 1 m/s | 2 m/s | 5 m/s | 10 m/s | 25 m/s |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Aluminium 20 °C | 4.55 m/s | 75 N | 132 N | 178 N | 135 N | 63 N |
| Aluminium 100 °C | 6.12 m/s | 57 N | 106 N | 175 N | 159 N | 83 N |
| Copper 20 °C | 2.74 m/s | 115 N | 170 N | 151 N | 91 N | 39 N |
Peak force (about 179 N) in this approximation is independent of conductivity, set by field and area.
Example 2: heat from stopping a vehicle
| Item | Value |
|---|---|
| Vehicle mass and speed | 5 t, 25 m/s |
| Kinetic energy | 1.56 MJ |
| Temperature rise of a 50 kg aluminium fin | about 35 K |
| Braking power per pair at 25 m/s | 1.6 kW |
Copper conducts better, yet aluminium brakes harder at speed.
Better conductors carry stronger eddy currents whose field expels the applied field more effectively, so force levels off at a lower speed v_c. Copper peaks at 2.7 m/s and aluminium at 4.6 m/s, so above that copper's force falls sooner. For braking from high speed, as on roller coasters, aluminium or thinner fins are better; for strong braking at low speed, copper or thicker fins. Temperature works the same way: hotter aluminium conducts less, reducing low-speed force but increasing high-speed force. Repeated stops heat the fin and change braking, so continuous operation calls for coupled electromagnetic–thermal tracking of temperature and force.
Analysis workflow
- Use the magnetic Reynolds number to judge whether field expulsion matters.
- Compute eddy currents and force with electromagnetic analysis including moving conductors (moving frame or motion terms).
- Pass Joule heat to thermal analysis for fin temperature rise and cooling.
- Update conductivity with temperature and track force over repeated stops.
- Also check magnet demagnetisation from temperature rise.
“Not stopping fully on summer afternoons”
On one ride's eddy-current brake, crowded summer afternoons saw cars fail to stop at the set point, with the auxiliary brake acting more often. Continuous operation heated the aluminium fins, lowering conductivity and reducing force in the latter, low-speed part of the brake zone. Coupled electromagnetic–thermal analysis reproduced the stopping point extending once fins exceeded 70 °C. Thicker fins with more cooling area limited the temperature rise and stabilised stopping.
Common mistakes
Mistakes and fixes
| Mistake | Effect | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Assuming force always ∝ speed | High-speed force overestimated | Check Rm |
| Constant conductivity | Continuous-use drift missed | Update with temperature |
| Infinite-sheet formula as is | Force overestimated | Analyse edge effects |
| Expecting it to stop at low speed | Doesn't fully stop | Add another brake |
| Ignoring magnet temperature | Force loss from demagnetisation | Check magnet temperature |
I'd like to learn related topics.
Related pages include eddy-current heating, induction heating, Joule heating, RF heating simulation and transformer hot-spot analysis.