Sloshing-Structure Coupling

Category: Analysis | Integrated 2026-04-06
CAE visualization for sloshing structure theory - technical simulation diagram
Sloshing-Structure Coupling

Sloshing-Structure Coupling: Theoretical Foundations

Sloshing Overview

๐Ÿ™‹

What kind of phenomenon is sloshing?


๐ŸŽ“

It is a phenomenon where liquid inside a container violently oscillates due to external excitation (earthquake, waves, vehicle acceleration, etc.). It becomes important in LNG carrier cargo tanks, spent fuel pools at nuclear power plants, rocket propellant tanks, and so on.


Governing Equations

๐Ÿ™‹

What is the mathematical model for sloshing?


๐ŸŽ“

In linear theory, it is described by the velocity potential $\phi$. The natural sloshing frequency of the free surface for a rectangular tank is:


$$ \omega_n = \sqrt{\frac{n\pi g}{L} \tanh\left(\frac{n\pi h}{L}\right)} $$

Where $L$ is the tank length, $h$ is the liquid height, and $n$ is the mode number.


๐ŸŽ“

For nonlinear sloshing (large amplitude, wave breaking, accompanied by impact pressure), the Navier-Stokes equations are solved using the VOF method.


$$ \rho \left( \frac{\partial \mathbf{u}}{\partial t} + (\mathbf{u} \cdot \nabla)\mathbf{u} \right) = -\nabla p + \mu \nabla^2 \mathbf{u} + \rho \mathbf{g} $$

The impact pressure on the tank wall (sloshing impact) can reach several MPa locally.


๐Ÿ™‹

How is coupling with the structure handled?


๐ŸŽ“

FSI (Fluid-Structure Interaction) becomes necessary when the elastic deformation of the tank wall affects the liquid surface behavior. Particularly in membrane-type LNG tanks (Mark III, NO96), the thin corrugated structure deforms under sloshing impact, which changes the pressure distribution.

Coffee Break Casual Talk

Sloshing "Natural Frequency" โ€“ The Tank Shape Decides Everything

The most frightening aspect of sloshing is "resonance." The natural frequency of the liquid inside a tank can be calculated for a rectangular tank as fโ‚ โ‰ˆ (1/2ฯ€)โˆš(ฯ€g/Lยทtanh(ฯ€h/L)) (L is tank length, h is liquid depth). When the tank is about half full and this natural frequency matches the ship's rolling period, the amplitude increases explosively. In the design of early LNG carriers in the 1960s, overlooking this resonance condition led to repeated impact loads on the tank walls and frequent accidents where insulation peeled off. Since then, the industry's operational rule has been to "maintain a full or nearly empty loading condition and avoid passing through the resonance range."

Computational Methods for Sloshing-Structure Coupling

Numerical Methods

๐Ÿ™‹

What methods are used for sloshing FSI?


๐ŸŽ“
MethodFluidStructureApplication
VOF-FEMFVM(VOF)FEMGeneral purpose. Impact pressure + structural response.
SPH-FEMSPHFEMStrong for wave breaking and splashing.
BEMPanel methodmodalLinear sloshing. Efficient.
MPS (Particle Method)MPSFEMDeveloped in Japan. Strong for free surfaces.
๐Ÿ™‹

Is the MPS method a Japanese-origin technique?


๐ŸŽ“

It is the Moving Particle Semi-implicit method developed by Professor Seiichi Koshizuka (University of Tokyo). It has been commercialized as Particleworks by Prometech. It can stably track large deformations and splashing of free surfaces and has many achievements in sloshing analysis.


Impact Pressure Evaluation

๐Ÿ™‹

How is sloshing impact pressure evaluated?


๐ŸŽ“

Impact pressure includes air pocket type (compressed air cushion) and flip-through type (direct impact).


  • Air pocket type: Air is trapped and compressed between the liquid surface and the wall. Oscillatory pressure waveform. Peak pressure is lower but duration is longer.
  • Flip-through type: The liquid surface rises along the wall and strikes it directly. Very high peak pressure but short duration.

When compressibility is considered, two-phase flow analysis including the polytropic process of air is necessary.

Coffee Break Casual Talk

SPH and VOF โ€“ The "Two Major Schools" of Sloshing Analysis

In sloshing numerical analysis, the grid-based VOF (Volume of Fluid) method and the meshless SPH (Smoothed Particle Hydrodynamics) method have long competed. VOF has a rich track record in OpenFOAM and STAR-CCM+ and its approach to capturing the gas-liquid interface is intuitive. On the other hand, SPH's strength is its natural handling of large liquid deformations (collision with tank walls, splashing). In the shipbuilding industry, IHI and Samsung Heavy Industries actively utilize SPH for sloshing impact pressure analysis. Recently, environments have been established where SPH calculations are parallelized on GPUs, completing simulations with millions of particles in a few hours. The practical answer is not which one is "correct," but to choose based on the analysis objective.

Sloshing-Structure Coupling in Practice

LNG Tank Analysis Procedure

๐Ÿ™‹

How do you proceed with sloshing analysis for an LNG carrier?


๐ŸŽ“

1. Calculate hull motion via seakeeping analysis (time history of 6-DOF motion).

2. Set tank geometry and liquid level (partial fill ratio is critical. 20-80% is the dangerous range).

3. Perform CFD (VOF/SPH/MPS) sloshing analysis.

4. Statistical processing of wall pressure (short-term / long-term extreme value distribution).

5. Structural response analysis (input impact pressure into FE model).


๐Ÿ™‹

Why is a mid-range fill ratio dangerous?


๐ŸŽ“

If the liquid level is too low, the liquid mass is small; if too high, the liquid movement is restricted. Sloshing becomes most violent at intermediate fill ratios of 40-70%. The IGC Code (International Code for the Construction and Equipment of Ships Carrying Liquefied Gases in Bulk) restricts navigation within dangerous fill ratio ranges.


Impact Pressure Statistical Processing

๐Ÿ™‹

How is the variation in impact pressure handled?


๐ŸŽ“

Sloshing impact pressure shows extremely large probabilistic variation. Even under identical conditions, peak pressure can vary by more than 10 times between impact events.


๐ŸŽ“

Extreme value statistical processing using Gumbel or Weibull distribution is performed to estimate the maximum pressure for the design lifetime. Hundreds of impact events are obtained from a short-term 3-hour analysis to estimate the parameters of the extreme value distribution.

Coffee Break Casual Talk

LNG Carrier No.96 Type Tanks โ€“ The Crystallization of Sloshing Countermeasures

Among the membrane-type tanks that dominate global LNG transport, GTT's No.96 type is designed with a complex insulation structure to absorb sloshing loads. For large LNG carriers with tank capacities of 140,000 to 170,000 cubic meters, sloshing analysis requires hundreds of simulation cases, exhaustively verifying combinations of wave conditions, loading rates, and sailing speeds. Major Japanese shipyards (Mitsubishi Heavy Industries, Kawasaki Heavy Industries) have dedicated sloshing test equipment (placing a 1/50 scale model on a 6-DOF motion platform) used to validate CFD results. The cost of sloshing analysis for building one LNG carrier reaches tens of millions of yen.

Sloshing-Structure Coupling: Software & Solver Comparison

Tool Comparison

๐Ÿ™‹

What tools are available for sloshing analysis?


๐ŸŽ“
ToolMethodFeatures
Particleworks (Prometech)MPS MethodJapanese-made. Many achievements in LNG sloshing.
FLOW-3D (Flow Science)VOF (TruVOF)Specialized in free surface tracking.
OpenFOAM (interFoam)VOFOSS. Free customization.
STAR-CCM+VOF/Euler multiphaseEasy setup of tank motion.
LS-DYNASPHOriginally for impact/crash, also used for sloshing.
Related Simulators

Experience the theory firsthand with the interactive simulator for this field

All Simulators

Related fields

Structural AnalysisElectromagnetic Field AnalysisThermal Analysis
Rate this article
Thank you for your feedback!
Helpful
More details
Report error
Helpful
0
More details
0
Report error
0
Written by NovaSolver Contributors
Anonymous Engineers & AI โ€” Sitemap
About the Authors