Composite Laminate Plate Analyzer (CLT) Back
Composite / CLT

Composite Laminate Plate Analyzer (CLT)

Compute ABD matrices, in-plane strains and curvatures, ply stresses, and Tsai-Wu/Tsai-Hill failure criteria based on Classical Lamination Theory in real time. Ideal for CFRP and GFRP laminate design.

Material Properties
E₁ [GPa]
GPa
E₂ [GPa]
GPa
G₁₂ [GPa]
GPa
ν₁₂
Ply Thickness & Strength
Ply thickness t_k [mm]
mm
F₁t [MPa]
MPa
F₁c [MPa]
MPa
F₂t [MPa]
MPa
F₁₂ [MPa]
MPa
Layup
Preset layups
Fiber angle of each ply (ply 1-8, degrees)
Applied Loads
Nₓ [N/mm]
N/mm
Nᵧ [N/mm]
N/mm
Nₓᵧ [N/mm]
N/mm
Mₓ [N·mm/mm]
N·mm/mm
Results
Effective Eₓ [GPa]
Effective Eᵧ [GPa]
Effective Gₓᵧ [GPa]
Effective νₓᵧ
Minimum FI (Tsai-Wu)
Max σ₁ [MPa]
Total thickness [mm]
Laminate symmetry
Per-Ply In-Plane Principal Stress σ₁, σ₂, τ₁₂
Theory & Key Formulas

Laminate force-strain relationship (ABD matrix):

$$\begin{bmatrix}N \\ M \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}A & B \\ B & D \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}\varepsilon^0 \\ \kappa \end{bmatrix}$$

Ply stress in material axes: $\{\sigma\}_k = [Q]_k [T]_k \{\varepsilon\}(z_k)$

$A_{ij}= \sum_k \bar{Q}_{ij}^{(k)}(z_k - z_{k-1})$, $D_{ij}= \frac{1}{3}\sum_k \bar{Q}_{ij}^{(k)}(z_k^3 - z_{k-1}^3)$

CAE Applications Abaqus Composite Shell elements and Nastran CQUAD4 also perform CLT calculations internally. Comparing with hand CLT calculations is the first step in FEM model verification (V&V). Pay attention to stacking sequence and angle sign conventions when defining PCOMP/PLY.
Tsai-Wu Failure Index & ABD Matrix
ABD Matrix [N/mm, N·mm/mm, N·mm]
Calculating...
Per-Ply Stress & Failure Index Table
Ply #Angle [°]σ₁ [MPa]σ₂ [MPa]τ₁₂ [MPa]Tsai-Wu FITsai-Hill FIStatus

Related Tools

Projectile motionSimulator
real-time rendering of parabolic trajectory by varying initial velocity, launch angle, height, and gravity
Composite Beam & Transformed Section Stress Distribution
Calculate stress distribution of composite beams made of dissimilar materials using the transformed section method
2DOF system & Dynamic absorber
Real-time frequency response of 2-DOF coupled vibration and optimal tuning effect of dynamic absorber (TMD)…
Plane Truss Analysis (Joint Method & Direct Stiffness Method)
Calculate node displacement and member stress of plane truss using direct stiffness method

What is Classical Lamination Theory (CLT)?

🙋
What exactly is the "ABD matrix" that this simulator calculates? It sounds complicated.
🎓
Basically, it's the "stiffness passport" for your entire layered composite. The A, B, and D matrices tell us how the laminate responds to stretching, bending, and twisting loads. In practice, when you input the ply properties like E₁ and E₂ in the left panel, the simulator builds this matrix in real-time to predict how your plate will deform.
🙋
Wait, really? So if I change the ply thickness `t_k` slider, it changes this matrix instantly?
🎓
Exactly! The thickness and stacking sequence of each ply are crucial. For instance, a thick carbon fiber ply on the outside will make the laminate very stiff in bending (affecting the D matrix). Try adding a 90-degree ply and watch how the A₁₁ value changes—it directly shows how the in-plane stiffness is altered.
🙋
And the failure criteria like Tsai-Wu... what are those for? Are they checking if my design will break?
🎓
In practice, yes! They are multi-axial safety checks. A common case is a wing skin: it's stretched and bent at the same time. Tsai-Wu uses the strength parameters you set—F₁t, F₁c, F₂t—to calculate a failure index. If the index goes above 1.0 when you apply a load `Nₓ`, that ply has failed. The simulator shows this per ply, so you can see the weakest link.

Physical Model & Key Equations

The core of CLT is the constitutive relation that links the applied forces and moments (N, M) to the mid-plane strains and curvatures (ε⁰, κ) of the laminate. This is done through the combined ABD stiffness matrix.

$$ \begin{bmatrix}N \\ M \end{bmatrix}= \begin{bmatrix}A & B \\ B & D \end{bmatrix}\begin{bmatrix}\varepsilon^0 \\ \kappa \end{bmatrix}$$

N: In-plane force resultant [N/mm]. M: Moment resultant [N·mm/mm]. A: Extensional stiffness matrix. B: Coupling stiffness matrix. D: Bending stiffness matrix. ε⁰: Mid-plane strain. κ: Plate curvature.

To assess the safety of each individual ply, we calculate its stress in the material direction and evaluate it against a failure criterion. The Tsai-Wu criterion is a common interactive tensor polynomial.

$$ F_i \sigma_i + F_{ij}\sigma_i \sigma_j \geq 1 \quad \text{(Failure when ≥ 1)}$$

Here, σ_i are the ply stresses (σ₁, σ₂, τ₁₂). The coefficients F_i and F_{ij} are derived from the ply strengths you input: tensile/compressive strength in fiber direction (F₁t, F₁c), transverse strength (F₂t, F₂c), and shear strength (F₁₂). An index below 1 means the ply is safe.

Frequently Asked Questions

Enter the angle (in degrees) of the material principal axis of each ply relative to the overall reference coordinate system of the laminate (typically, the longitudinal direction of the plate is 0°). For example, 0° means the fibers are parallel to the reference direction, and 90° means they are perpendicular. For unidirectional CFRP, this angle significantly affects stiffness and strength.
If the B matrix is non-zero, applying an in-plane force (N) induces bending deformation (κ), and conversely, applying a bending moment (M) induces in-plane deformation (ε⁰), resulting in coupling. This is prominent in asymmetric laminates (e.g., [0/90]) and can cause warping or twisting after curing. Therefore, symmetric laminates are recommended in design.
Tsai-Hill is simple to calculate and widely used for predicting initial failure in unidirectional materials. Tsai-Wu can account for differences in tensile and compressive strength, allowing for more accurate evaluation. For general design studies, Tsai-Hill is sufficient, but Tsai-Wu is recommended when stricter safety margins are required or when compressive loads are dominant.
Material constants for CFRP or GFRP can generally be obtained from technical data sheets published by prepreg manufacturers. Typical values include E1=135 GPa and E2=9 GPa for high-strength CFRP. If unknown, refer to the standard values preset in this simulator as initial values and select a material close to your design target.

Applications

Aerospace Wing & Fuselage Skins: Composite laminates are designed to be lightweight yet withstand complex aerodynamic loads and pressurization. Engineers use CLT to optimize ply angles (e.g., [0/±45/90]s) to achieve the right balance of stiffness, strength, and buckling resistance, exactly as you can experiment with in this simulator.

Wind Turbine Blades: These massive structures experience extreme bending and torsional loads. CLT analysis is critical for placing unidirectional plies (high E₁) along the spar caps for bending strength and ±45° plies in the shear webs to handle torsional forces, ensuring a 20+ year lifespan.

Automotive Chassis & Body Panels: In high-performance or electric vehicles, carbon fiber panels reduce weight to increase range or speed. CAE engineers use CLT to simulate crashworthiness, where the coupling effects (B matrix) and progressive ply failure (Tsai-Wu) are analyzed to manage energy absorption.

Sports Equipment (Racquets, Bikes): The feel and performance of a tennis racket or bicycle frame are finely tuned by layering plies at specific angles. CLT helps designers tailor the bending stiffness (D matrix) and torsional rigidity by adjusting the sequence, much like changing parameters here to see the immediate effect on deformation.

Common Misconceptions and Points to Note

First, the misconception that "you can input any material constant and still get a result." For example, CFRP's E₁ (longitudinal Young's modulus) is around 120 GPa, but are you inadvertently using a value for GFRP (about 40 GPa)? This changes the order of magnitude of the results, rendering them useless. Initially, it's safest to copy and use the default values in the tool or values from a material database as-is. Next, the assumption that "a failure criterion value below 1.0 guarantees absolute safety." Even with a Tsai-Wu ratio of 0.95, failure can still occur in reality due to delamination, manufacturing defects, or cyclic loading. Simulation results are merely a "guideline for comparison." Finally, the pitfall of thinking "only 0° and 90° ply angles need to be considered." While symmetric laminates like [0/90]s are fundamental, ±45° plies are essential if you want to increase shear stiffness. For instance, incorporating diverse angles like in a [0/±45/90]s laminate makes it stronger against complex loads.