Shrink Fit / Press Fit Analysis
Theory and Physics
What is Press-fit?
Professor, what is press-fit analysis?
Press-fit (interference fit) is a fastening method where a negative clearance (interference amount) is provided between a shaft and a hole. During assembly, the shaft is pressed into the hole, or the hole is heated to expand before inserting the shaft.
Setting Interference Amount in FEM
Two approaches:
1. Geometrically Overlapping Mesh — Arrange the shaft and hole meshes to overlap by the interference amount. The contact resolves the interference.
2. Initial Clearance Adjustment — Use *CLEARANCE ADJUSTMENT in the contact definition to numerically specify the interference amount.
Can it calculate even with overlapping meshes?
The penalty method in contact "pushes back" the interference, generating physically correct contact pressure. Abaqus's *SURFACE INTERACTION + OVERCLOSURE=ADJUST is convenient.
Summary
Key points:
- Set interference amount in contact definition — Geometric overlap or CLEARANCE ADJUSTMENT
- Contact pressure = Compare with Lamé's thick-walled cylinder formula — Verify with $p = \delta E^* / D$
- Bearing press-fit, gear hub-shaft, camshaft — Main applications
Press-fit in the Steam Engine Era
The industrial origin of press-fit/shrink-fit dates back to steam locomotives in the 1820s. In George Stephenson's Rocket (1829), a method of heating and expanding iron wheels to fit them onto axles was adopted. The precision at that time was about ±0.1mm, which is considered one of the first industrial design cases theoretically supported by the elastic solution for thick-walled cylinders (Lamé solution) established by Lamé (1852).
Physical Meaning of Each Term
- Inertia term (mass term): $\rho \ddot{u}$, meaning "mass × acceleration". Have you ever experienced being thrown forward during sudden braking? That "feeling of being carried away" is precisely the inertial force. Heavier objects are harder to set in motion and harder to stop once moving. Buildings shake during earthquakes because the ground moves suddenly while the building's mass "gets left behind". In static analysis, this term is set to zero, assuming "forces are applied slowly enough to ignore acceleration". It absolutely cannot be omitted for impact loads or vibration problems.
- Stiffness term (elastic restoring force): $Ku$ or $\nabla \cdot \sigma$. When you pull a spring, you feel a force "trying to return", right? That is Hooke's law $F=kx$, the essence of the stiffness term. Now a question — an iron rod and a rubber band, which stretches more when pulled with the same force? Obviously the rubber. This "resistance to stretching" is the Young's modulus $E$, which determines stiffness. A common misconception: "High stiffness ≠ strong". Stiffness is "resistance to deformation", strength is "resistance to failure" — they are different concepts.
- External force term (load term): Body force $f_b$ (gravity, etc.) and surface force $f_s$ (pressure, contact force, etc.). Think of it this way — the weight of a truck on a bridge is a "force acting on the entire contents" (body force), while the force of the tire pushing the road surface is a "force acting only on the surface" (surface force). Wind pressure, water pressure, bolt tightening force... all are external forces. A common mistake here: getting the load direction wrong. Intending "tension" but it becomes "compression" — sounds like a joke, but it actually happens when coordinate systems rotate in 3D space.
- Damping term: Rayleigh damping $C\dot{u} = (\alpha M + \beta K)\dot{u}$. Try plucking a guitar string. Does the sound continue forever? No, it gradually fades. That's because vibration energy is converted to heat by air resistance and internal friction in the string. Car shock absorbers work on the same principle — intentionally absorbing vibration energy to improve ride comfort. What if damping were zero? Buildings would keep shaking forever after an earthquake. Since that doesn't happen in reality, setting appropriate damping is crucial.
Assumptions and Applicability Limits
- Continuum assumption: Treats material as a continuous medium, ignoring microscopic heterogeneity.
- Small deformation assumption (for linear analysis): Deformation is sufficiently small compared to initial dimensions, and the stress-strain relationship is linear.
- Isotropic material (unless otherwise specified): Material properties are independent of direction (anisotropic materials require separate tensor definitions).
- Quasi-static assumption (for static analysis): Ignores inertial and damping forces, considering only the balance between external and internal forces.
- Non-applicable cases: For large deformation/large rotation problems, geometric nonlinearity is required. For nonlinear material behavior like plasticity and creep, constitutive law extensions are needed.
Dimensional Analysis and Unit Systems
| Variable | SI Unit | Notes / Conversion Memo |
|---|---|---|
| Displacement $u$ | m (meter) | When inputting in mm, unify loads and elastic modulus to MPa/N system. |
| Stress $\sigma$ | Pa (Pascal) = N/m² | MPa = 10⁶ Pa. Be careful of unit system inconsistency when comparing with yield stress. |
| Strain $\varepsilon$ | Dimensionless (m/m) | Note the distinction between engineering strain and logarithmic strain (for large deformation). |
| Elastic modulus $E$ | Pa | Steel: ~210 GPa, Aluminum: ~70 GPa. Note temperature dependence. |
| Density $\rho$ | kg/m³ | In mm system: tonne/mm³ (= 10⁻⁹ tonne/mm³ for steel). |
| Force $F$ | N (Newton) | Unify as N in mm system, N in m system. |
Numerical Methods and Implementation
FEM Settings for Press-fit
```
*CONTACT PAIR
shaft_outer, hub_inner
*SURFACE BEHAVIOR, PENALTY
*SURFACE INTERACTION, NAME=interference
*CLEARANCE, OVERCLOSURE=ADJUST, VALUE=-0.05 $ Interference amount 0.05mm
```
Introducing interference gradually (starting from zero interference → gradually reaching target interference) improves convergence.
Summary
Lamé Solution and FEM Correction
The stress distribution of a press-fit can be calculated quite accurately with Lamé's (1852) analytical solution, but FEM correction becomes necessary at hole edges or steps. ABAQUS adopts an algorithm that specifies the interference amount with the INTERFERENCE FIT option, treating it as uniform penetration in the first increment before converging the contact forces. This allows reproducing the stress concentration factor for a shaft-hub joint with 100μm interference within ±5% of measured values.
Linear Elements (1st-order Elements)
Linear interpolation between nodes. Low computational cost but low stress accuracy. Beware of shear locking (mitigated by reduced integration or B-bar method).
Quadratic Elements (with Midside Nodes)
Can represent curved deformation. Stress accuracy improves significantly, but degrees of freedom increase by about 2-3 times. Recommended: when stress evaluation is important.
Full Integration vs Reduced Integration
Full Integration: Risk of over-constraint (locking). Reduced Integration: Risk of hourglass modes (zero-energy modes). Choose appropriately for the situation.
Adaptive Mesh
Automatic refinement based on error indicators (e.g., ZZ estimator). Efficiently improves accuracy in stress concentration areas. Includes h-method (element subdivision) and p-method (order increase).
Newton-Raphson Method
Standard method for nonlinear analysis. Updates the tangent stiffness matrix each iteration. Achieves quadratic convergence within the convergence radius, but computational cost is high.
Modified Newton-Raphson Method
Updates the tangent stiffness matrix using the initial value or every few iterations. Cost per iteration is low, but convergence speed is linear.
Convergence Criteria
Force residual norm: $||R|| / ||F_{ext}|| < \epsilon$ (typically $\epsilon = 10^{-3}$ to $10^{-6}$). Displacement increment norm: $||\Delta u|| / ||u|| < \epsilon$. Energy norm: $\Delta u \cdot R < \epsilon$
Load Increment Method
Instead of applying the full load at once, apply it in small increments. The arc-length method (Riks method) can trace beyond extremum points on the load-displacement curve.
Analogy: Direct Method vs Iterative Method
The direct method is like "solving simultaneous equations accurately with pen and paper" — reliable but takes too long for large-scale problems. The iterative method is like "repeatedly guessing to approach the correct answer" — starts with a rough answer but improves accuracy with each iteration. It's the same principle as looking up a word in a dictionary: it's more efficient to open it at an estimated location and adjust forward/backward (iterative) than to search sequentially from the first page (direct).
Relationship Between Mesh Order and Accuracy
1st-order elements are like "approximating a curve with a ruler" — represented by straight line segments, so accuracy is limited. 2nd-order elements are like "flexible curves" — can represent curved changes, dramatically improving accuracy even at the same mesh density. However, computational cost per element increases, so judge based on total cost-effectiveness.
Practical Guide
Press-fit in Practice
Used for bearing press-fit, gear hub-shaft fastening, flywheel press-fit.
Practical Checklist
Shinkansen Axle Press-fit Analysis
Since the 2010s, JR East has utilized ABAQUS Standard for fatigue crack propagation analysis in the axle-wheel press-fit sections of Shinkansen bogies. Starting from the contact pressure distribution equivalent to 0.3mm interference, they calculate the stress intensity factor KI using XFEM under repeated running loads, providing a numerical basis for reviewing conventional ultrasonic flaw detection inspection intervals (running distance of 600,000 km). The analysis results were published as a joint study with the Railway Technical Research Institute.
Analogy: Analysis Flow
The analysis flow is actually very similar to cooking. First, buy ingredients (prepare CAD model), do the prep work (mesh generation), apply heat (solver execution), and finally plate it (visualization in post-processing). Here's an important question — which step in cooking is most prone to failure? Actually, it's the "prep work". If mesh quality is poor, the results will be a mess no matter how excellent the solver is.
Pitfalls Beginners Often Fall Into
Are you checking mesh convergence? Do you think "the calculation ran = the result is correct"? This is actually the most common trap for CAE beginners. The solver will always return "some answer" for the given mesh. But if the mesh is too coarse, that answer can be far from reality. Confirm that results stabilize across at least three levels of mesh density — neglecting this leads to the dangerous assumption that "the computer gave the answer, so it must be correct".
Thinking About Boundary Conditions
Setting boundary conditions is like "writing the problem statement" for an exam. If the problem statement is wrong? No matter how accurately you calculate, the answer will be wrong. "Is this surface really fully fixed?" "Is this load really uniformly distributed?" — Correctly modeling real-world constraint conditions is often the most critical step in the entire analysis.
Software Comparison
Tools for Press-fit
Selection Guide
History of Dedicated Interference Fit Solvers
Dedicated press-fit analysis features were first commercially organized in MSC Nastran's SOL 601 (nonlinear static analysis) as V2004. The ability to simply specify the interference amount in the CONTACT DIRECTIVE and automatically calculate prestress was well-received in practice. Around 2012, Simulia began providing an INTERFERENCE FIT wizard in the ABAQUS/CAE GUI, establishing a workflow to directly input interference amounts from drawings.
The Three Most Important Questions for Selection
- "What are you solving?": Does it support the physical models and element types needed for press-fit/press-in analysis? For example, in fluids, the presence of LES support; in structures, the capability for contact and large deformation makes a difference.
- "Who will use it?": For beginner teams, tools with rich GUIs are suitable; for experienced users, flexible script-driven tools are better. Similar to the difference between automatic (GUI) and manual (script) transmission cars.
- "How far will it expand?": Choosing with future expansion in mind — scaling up analysis scale (HPC support), expansion to other departments, integration with other tools — leads to long-term cost reduction.
Advanced Technology
Advanced Research in Press-fit
Related Topics
なった
詳しく
報告