Immersion Cooling

Category: Thermal – Electronics Cooling | Revised 2026-10-01
CAE visualization for immersion cooling theory - technical simulation diagram
Immersion Cooling

Theory: liquid heat capacity and boiling

Overview

🙋

I hear data centres submerge servers in liquid. Does it really cool that well?

🎓

Air and liquids differ by orders of magnitude in heat transport. Dielectric oil holds about 1,500 times air's heat per volume, so modest flow carries a lot of heat and fan power disappears. Two-phase immersion boils a fluorocarbon, using latent heat to hold parts near the boiling point. But boiling has a ceiling, the critical heat flux, much lower for fluorocarbons than for water. Let's compare air, oil and fluorocarbon on heat capacity, natural convection and boiling.

Heat capacity and natural convection

$$ \dot V = \frac{\dot Q}{\rho c_p\,\Delta T},\qquad Nu_L = \left\{0.825 + \frac{0.387\,Ra_L^{1/6}}{\left[1+(0.492/Pr)^{9/16}\right]^{8/27}}\right\}^2 $$

Top: volumetric flow needed to carry $\dot Q$ at a rise $\Delta T$. Bottom: natural convection on a vertical surface (Churchill–Chu).

Boiling critical heat flux

$$ q''_{CHF} = 0.149\,h_{fg}\,\rho_v\left[\frac{\sigma g(\rho_l-\rho_v)}{\rho_v^2}\right]^{1/4} $$
Coffee Break Trivia

It started with supercomputers

Submerging electronics isn't new: the 1985 Cray-2 supercomputer immersed its boards in an inert fluorocarbon liquid. Air cooling later regained dominance, but from the late 2010s AI computing sharply raised per-server heat, and immersion cooling drew attention again in data centres, eliminating fan power and greatly reducing cooling energy.

Worked examples

Example 1: flow to cool a 30 kW rack at 10 K rise

CoolantVolumetric heat capacityRequired flow
Air1.17 kJ/m³K2.57 m³/s
Dielectric oil1.70 MJ/m³K106 L/min
Water (reference)4.16 MJ/m³K43 L/min

Example 2: natural convection on a 30 mm surface (20 K)

FluidPrandtl numberhHeat flux
Air0.76.7 W/m²K0.01 W/cm²
Dielectric oil262121 W/m²K0.24 W/cm²
Fluorocarbon (single-phase)9.2277 W/m²K0.55 W/cm²

Example 3: CHF for two-phase immersion

FluidCHF (Zuber)
Fluorocarbon (FC-72-like)16.2 W/cm²
Water (reference, 1 atm)125.9 W/cm²

For a 2 cm square chip limited to 70% of CHF, the fluorocarbon allows about 45 W.

🙋

Fluorocarbon boiling carries only an eighth of water's heat flux. Why use it anyway?

🎓

Water conducts electricity, so circuits can't be submerged in it. Fluorocarbons insulate well, are chemically stable and can be chosen to boil around 50 °C. They hold component surfaces near the boiling point with little temperature variation. Their low CHF is offset by copper heat spreaders on chips to enlarge the boiling area, or fine surface textures that promote boiling. Single-phase oil doesn't boil, so CHF isn't a concern, but its natural-convection h is only about 120 W/m²K, so high-power parts get heat sinks or pumped flow.

Design tips

  1. Choose single- or two-phase by component heat flux and temperature requirements.
  2. In two-phase, check CHF margin at the highest-flux component.
  3. In single-phase, model tank flow so warmed liquid doesn't stagnate around parts.
  4. Check compatibility of liquid with components, cables and seals (swelling, degradation).
  5. In two-phase, size the vapour condenser and manage evaporative loss.
Coffee Break Trivia

“Only the GPUs ran hot”

In one two-phase immersion trial, CPUs cooled without trouble but high-performance GPUs neared their temperature limits. The GPU dies had high heat per area, so surface flux approached the fluorocarbon's CHF. Fitting copper plates with boiling-enhancing porous coatings onto the dies enlarged the boiling area and dropped temperatures considerably. Even with immersion, local heat flux must be watched.

Common mistakes

Mistakes and fixes

MistakeEffectFix
Using average heat fluxLocal CHF exceededCheck peak flux
Using water's CHFCapacity overrated 8×Use the fluid's properties
Ignoring tank flowLocal hot spotsModel the flow
Ignoring material compatibilityComponent degradationImmersion testing
Ignoring oil viscosity vs temperatureHeat transfer wrongTemperature-dependent properties
🙋

I'd like to learn related topics.

Related Simulators

Experience the theory firsthand with the interactive simulator for this field

All Simulators

Related fields

Structural AnalysisFluid Analysis (CFD)Manufacturing & Process Simulation
Rate this article
Thank you for your feedback!
Helpful
More details
Report error
Helpful
0
More details
0
Report error
0