Planar Transformer
Theory: skin and proximity effects
Overview
Our planar transformer windings run hotter than expected. Will thicker copper fix it?
At high frequency, current flows only near the conductor surface (skin effect). With many stacked layers, other layers' fields push current to one side of each conductor (proximity effect). If all primary layers are stacked before the secondaries, the field between layers grows with each added layer. Thick copper in that field worsens current crowding, and resistance can even rise when copper is thickened. So first reduce inter-layer field by winding order, then choose a thickness suited to the skin depth. Dowell's equation captures all this.
Dowell's equation
h is copper thickness, δ skin depth and m the number of layers over which MMF rises from zero to its peak (m = 4 for four primary layers stacked before four secondaries, m = 1 when interleaved).
Skin depth and leakage-field energy
ρ is copper resistivity (1.72×10⁻⁸ Ω·m). Leakage inductance is taken as proportional to the sum of squared inter-layer MMF F.
Dowell's 1966 paper
In 1966 Dowell treated transformer winding layers as flat sheets and derived an AC-resistance formula combining skin and proximity effects. It's also applied to round-wire windings by substituting sheets of equal cross-section, and underpins high-frequency transformer and inductor design. Planar windings are already flat copper, so they fit Dowell's assumptions well; where layers don't fill the core window width, or at layer edges, 2D effects appear and finite elements are used for precision.
Worked examples
Example 1: AC-to-DC resistance ratio F_R (500 kHz, skin depth 93 μm)
| Copper thickness | h/δ | Separated (m = 4) | Half interleaved (m = 2) | Interleaved (m = 1) |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 35 μm | 0.37 | 1.03 | 1.01 | 1.00 |
| 70 μm | 0.75 | 1.55 | 1.13 | 1.03 |
| 140 μm | 1.50 | 8.38 | 2.78 | 1.38 |
At 1 MHz (skin depth 66 μm): 3.11 / 1.51 / 1.11 for 70 μm and 20.7 / 5.77 / 2.04 for 140 μm. At 100 kHz (209 μm), even 140 μm stays at 1.35 / 1.08 / 1.02.
Example 2: winding order and leakage field (4 primary, 4 secondary layers)
| Order | Peak MMF | Leakage-field energy (relative) |
|---|---|---|
| PPPPSSSS | 4 | 1.000 |
| PPSSPPSS | 2 | 0.273 |
| PSPSPSPS | 1 | 0.091 |
At 140 μm DC resistance halves, yet in the separated arrangement actual resistance increases.
Actual resistance is DC resistance times F_R, so both the thickness-inverse DC resistance and F_R matter. Relative to 70 μm, separated windings at 140 μm rise by 8.38/2 ÷ 1.55 ≈ 2.7 times. Interleaved, F_R stays at 1.38, so thicker copper cuts resistance to 1.38/2 ÷ 1.03 ≈ 0.67 times. Whether thick copper helps is decided by winding order. Interleaving also cuts leakage inductance to about one-eleventh, reducing switching voltage spikes, but bringing primary and secondary closer raises inter-winding capacitance and common-mode noise paths. Resonant converters sometimes use leakage inductance as a circuit element, so choose the order to suit the purpose.
Design and analysis workflow
- Compute skin depth at operating frequency and shortlist copper thicknesses.
- Sketch MMF distribution for each winding order to set m.
- Compute AC resistance with Dowell's equation and sum losses over current harmonics.
- Check losses near layer edges and core gaps with 2D/3D finite elements.
- Measure leakage inductance and inter-winding capacitance against circuit requirements.
“Thicker copper ran hotter”
To cool a planar transformer in a 500 kHz supply, PCB copper was increased from 70 to 140 μm, but winding temperature actually rose. The windings had four primary layers above four secondary layers. Dowell's equation showed AC resistance had grown about 2.7-fold. Switching to an interleaved arrangement brought 140 μm resistance to about two-thirds of the 70 μm value, and temperature fell below target.
Common mistakes
Mistakes and fixes
| Mistake | Effect | Fix |
|---|---|---|
| Loss from DC resistance | Loss underestimated | F_R from Dowell |
| Thickening without reordering | Resistance increases | Combine with interleaving |
| Fundamental only | Harmonic loss missed | Sum per harmonic |
| Ignoring inter-winding capacitance | More common-mode noise | Evaluate capacitance |
| Ignoring loss near gaps | Local hot spots | Check with FE |
I'd like to learn related topics.
Related pages include leakage inductance, high-frequency transformers, core loss, the Steinmetz equation and current transformers.
Related Topics
Experience the theory firsthand with the interactive simulator for this field
All Simulators