Planar Transformer

Category: Electromagnetic Analysis – Transformers | Revised 2026-10-01
CAE visualization for planar transformer theory - technical simulation diagram
Planar Transformers

Theory: skin and proximity effects

Overview

🙋

Our planar transformer windings run hotter than expected. Will thicker copper fix it?

🎓

At high frequency, current flows only near the conductor surface (skin effect). With many stacked layers, other layers' fields push current to one side of each conductor (proximity effect). If all primary layers are stacked before the secondaries, the field between layers grows with each added layer. Thick copper in that field worsens current crowding, and resistance can even rise when copper is thickened. So first reduce inter-layer field by winding order, then choose a thickness suited to the skin depth. Dowell's equation captures all this.

Dowell's equation

$$ F_R = \frac{R_{ac}}{R_{dc}} = \Delta\left[\frac{\sinh 2\Delta + \sin 2\Delta}{\cosh 2\Delta - \cos 2\Delta} + \frac{2(m^2 - 1)}{3}\,\frac{\sinh\Delta - \sin\Delta}{\cosh\Delta + \cos\Delta}\right],\qquad \Delta = \frac{h}{\delta} $$

h is copper thickness, δ skin depth and m the number of layers over which MMF rises from zero to its peak (m = 4 for four primary layers stacked before four secondaries, m = 1 when interleaved).

Skin depth and leakage-field energy

$$ \delta = \sqrt{\frac{\rho}{\pi f \mu_0}},\qquad E_{leak} \propto \sum_{gaps} \mathcal{F}^2 $$

ρ is copper resistivity (1.72×10⁻⁸ Ω·m). Leakage inductance is taken as proportional to the sum of squared inter-layer MMF F.

Coffee Break Trivia

Dowell's 1966 paper

In 1966 Dowell treated transformer winding layers as flat sheets and derived an AC-resistance formula combining skin and proximity effects. It's also applied to round-wire windings by substituting sheets of equal cross-section, and underpins high-frequency transformer and inductor design. Planar windings are already flat copper, so they fit Dowell's assumptions well; where layers don't fill the core window width, or at layer edges, 2D effects appear and finite elements are used for precision.

Worked examples

Example 1: AC-to-DC resistance ratio F_R (500 kHz, skin depth 93 μm)

Copper thicknessh/δSeparated (m = 4)Half interleaved (m = 2)Interleaved (m = 1)
35 μm0.371.031.011.00
70 μm0.751.551.131.03
140 μm1.508.382.781.38

At 1 MHz (skin depth 66 μm): 3.11 / 1.51 / 1.11 for 70 μm and 20.7 / 5.77 / 2.04 for 140 μm. At 100 kHz (209 μm), even 140 μm stays at 1.35 / 1.08 / 1.02.

Example 2: winding order and leakage field (4 primary, 4 secondary layers)

OrderPeak MMFLeakage-field energy (relative)
PPPPSSSS41.000
PPSSPPSS20.273
PSPSPSPS10.091
🙋

At 140 μm DC resistance halves, yet in the separated arrangement actual resistance increases.

🎓

Actual resistance is DC resistance times F_R, so both the thickness-inverse DC resistance and F_R matter. Relative to 70 μm, separated windings at 140 μm rise by 8.38/2 ÷ 1.55 ≈ 2.7 times. Interleaved, F_R stays at 1.38, so thicker copper cuts resistance to 1.38/2 ÷ 1.03 ≈ 0.67 times. Whether thick copper helps is decided by winding order. Interleaving also cuts leakage inductance to about one-eleventh, reducing switching voltage spikes, but bringing primary and secondary closer raises inter-winding capacitance and common-mode noise paths. Resonant converters sometimes use leakage inductance as a circuit element, so choose the order to suit the purpose.

Design and analysis workflow

  1. Compute skin depth at operating frequency and shortlist copper thicknesses.
  2. Sketch MMF distribution for each winding order to set m.
  3. Compute AC resistance with Dowell's equation and sum losses over current harmonics.
  4. Check losses near layer edges and core gaps with 2D/3D finite elements.
  5. Measure leakage inductance and inter-winding capacitance against circuit requirements.
Coffee Break Trivia

“Thicker copper ran hotter”

To cool a planar transformer in a 500 kHz supply, PCB copper was increased from 70 to 140 μm, but winding temperature actually rose. The windings had four primary layers above four secondary layers. Dowell's equation showed AC resistance had grown about 2.7-fold. Switching to an interleaved arrangement brought 140 μm resistance to about two-thirds of the 70 μm value, and temperature fell below target.

Common mistakes

Mistakes and fixes

MistakeEffectFix
Loss from DC resistanceLoss underestimatedF_R from Dowell
Thickening without reorderingResistance increasesCombine with interleaving
Fundamental onlyHarmonic loss missedSum per harmonic
Ignoring inter-winding capacitanceMore common-mode noiseEvaluate capacitance
Ignoring loss near gapsLocal hot spotsCheck with FE
🙋

I'd like to learn related topics.

Related Simulators

Experience the theory firsthand with the interactive simulator for this field

All Simulators

Related fields

Coupled AnalysisStructural AnalysisThermal Analysis
Rate this article
Thank you for your feedback!
Helpful
More details
Report error
Helpful
0
More details
0
Report error
0