NAFEMS R0031/1: Fixed-End Beam Natural Frequencies

Category: 解析 | Integrated 2026-04-06
CAE visualization for nafems r0031 1 theory - technical simulation diagram
NAFEMS R0031/1: 固定梁の固有振動数

Theory and Physics

Overview

🧑‍🎓

Teacher! Today's topic is about NAFEMS R0031/1: Natural Frequencies of a Fixed Beam, right? What is it about?


🎓

The NAFEMS R0031 benchmark. Natural frequencies of a fixed-fixed beam. Verifies agreement with the reference value for the first mode.




Governing Equations




$$ f_n = \frac{\lambda_n^2}{2\pi L^2}\sqrt{\frac{EI}{\rho A}} $$
$$ \lambda_1 = 4.730,\; \lambda_2=7.853 $$




Discretization Method

🧑‍🎓

How do you actually solve this equation on a computer?


🎓

We use spatial discretization by the Finite Element Method (FEM). We assemble the element stiffness matrices and construct the global stiffness equation.


🎓

We transform it into the weak form (variational form) and use the Galerkin method formulation with test functions and shape functions. The choice of element type (low-order elements vs. higher-order elements, full integration vs. reduced integration) directly affects the trade-off between solution accuracy and computational cost.




Matrix Solution Algorithms

🧑‍🎓

What exactly are matrix solution algorithms?


🎓

We solve the system of equations using direct methods (LU decomposition, Cholesky decomposition) or iterative methods (CG method, GMRES method). For large-scale problems, preconditioned iterative methods are effective.



SolverClassificationMemory UsageApplicable Scale
LU decompositionDirect MethodO(n²)Small to Medium Scale
Cholesky decompositionDirect Method (Symmetric Positive Definite)O(n²)Small to Medium Scale
PCG MethodIterative MethodO(n)Large Scale
GMRES methodIterative MethodO(n·m)Large Scale / Non-symmetric
AMG PreconditionerPreprocessingO(n)Very Large Scale
🧑‍🎓

So, if you cut corners in the finite element method part, you'll pay for it later. I'll keep that in mind!


Implementation in Commercial Tools

🧑‍🎓

So, what software can be used to do NAFEMS R0031/1: Natural Frequencies of a Fixed Beam?


Tool NameDeveloper/CurrentMain File Formats
MSC Nastran / NX NastranMSC Nastran (Hexagon), NX Nastran (Siemens Digital Industries Software).bdf, .dat, .f06, .op2, .pch
Abaqus FEA (SIMULIA)Dassault Systèmes SIMULIA.inp, .odb, .cae, .sta, .msg
Ansys Mechanical (formerly ANSYS Structural)Ansys Inc..cdb, .rst, .db, .ans, .mac
COMSOL MultiphysicsCOMSOL AB.mph

Vendor Lineage and Product Integration History

🧑‍🎓

Does each software have a dramatic origin story?



MSC Nastran / NX Nastran

🧑‍🎓

Next is about MSC Nastran, right? What's the story?


🎓

Developed in the 1960s as NASA Structural Analysis (NASTRAN). Commercialized by MSC Software, later UGS (now Siemens) derived NX Nastran. MSC was acquired by Hexagon AB in 2017.

Current Affiliation: MSC Nastran (Hexagon), NX Nastran (Siemens Digital Industries Software)



Abaqus FEA (SIMULIA)

🧑‍🎓

What exactly is Abaqus FEA?


🎓

Developed in 1978 by HKS (Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen). Acquired by Dassault Systèmes in 2005 and integrated into the SIMULIA brand.

Current Affiliation: Dassault Systèmes SIMULIA


🧑‍🎓

Wait, wait, structural analysis... so, can it also be used for cases like this?



Ansys Mechanical (formerly ANSYS Structural)

🧑‍🎓

Tell me about "Ansys Mechanical"!


🎓

Developed in 1970 by Swanson Analysis Systems Inc. (SASI). Based on APDL (Ansys Parametric Design Language).

Current Affiliation: Ansys Inc.


🧑‍🎓

Wow, the structural analysis story is super interesting! Tell me more.


File Formats and Interoperability

🧑‍🎓

Are there any points to note when transferring data between different software?


FormatExtensionTypeOverview
STEP.stp/.stepNeutral CADISO 10303 compliant 3D CAD data exchange format. Supports geometry + PMI.
IGES.igs/.igesNeutral CADEarly CAD data exchange standard. Has issues with surface data compatibility. Transition to STEP is progressing.
VTK.vtk/.vtuVisualizationVisualization Toolkit format. Used by ParaView, etc.
🎓

When converting models between different solvers, attention must be paid to the correspondence of element types, compatibility of material models, and differences in the representation of loads and boundary conditions. Particularly, higher-order elements and special elements (cohesive elements, user-defined elements, etc.) often cannot be directly converted between solvers.


関連シミュレーター

この分野のインタラクティブシミュレーターで理論を体感しよう

シミュレーター一覧

関連する分野

構造解析流体解析熱解析
この記事の評価
ご回答ありがとうございます!
参考に
なった
もっと
詳しく
誤りを
報告
参考になった
0
もっと詳しく
0
誤りを報告
0
Written by NovaSolver Contributors
Anonymous Engineers & AI — サイトマップ
About the Authors