熱応力解析
Theory and Physics
Overview
Teacher! Today's topic is about thermal stress analysis, right? What is it?
It's a coupled analysis of thermal strain and thermal stress arising from temperature distribution. Stress occurs under constrained conditions. Essential for structures with large temperature gradients like engine components and turbine disks.
Wait, wait, you said 'thermal' arising from temperature distribution... so does that mean it can also be used in cases like this?
Governing Equations
After hearing this, I finally understand why describing thermal stress analysis is important!
Discretization Methods
How do you actually solve these equations on a computer?
We use spatial discretization by the Finite Element Method (FEM). We assemble the element stiffness matrix and construct the global stiffness equation.
We perform a transformation to the weak form (variational form) and use Galerkin method formulation with test functions and shape functions. The choice of element type (low-order elements vs. higher-order elements, full integration vs. reduced integration) directly affects the trade-off between solution accuracy and computational cost.
Matrix Solution Algorithms
What exactly are matrix solution algorithms?
Solve the simultaneous equations using direct methods (LU decomposition, Cholesky decomposition) or iterative methods (CG method, GMRES method). Preconditioned iterative methods are effective for large-scale problems.
| Solver | Classification | Memory Usage | Applicable Scale |
|---|---|---|---|
| LU decomposition | Direct Method | O(n²) | Small to Medium Scale |
| Cholesky decomposition | Direct Method (Symmetric Positive Definite) | O(n²) | Small to Medium Scale |
| PCG Method | Iterative Method | O(n) | Large Scale |
| GMRES method | Iterative Method | O(n·m) | Large Scale / Non-symmetric |
| AMG Preconditioner | Preprocessing | O(n) | Very Large Scale |
So, if you cut corners on the finite element method part, you'll pay for it later. I'll keep that in mind!
Implementation in Commercial Tools
So, what software can be used to do thermal stress analysis?
| Tool Name | Developer/Current | Main File Formats |
|---|---|---|
| COMSOL Multiphysics | COMSOL AB | .mph |
| Ansys Mechanical (formerly ANSYS Structural) | Ansys Inc. | .cdb, .rst, .db, .ans, .mac |
| Abaqus FEA (SIMULIA) | Dassault Systèmes SIMULIA | .inp, .odb, .cae, .sta, .msg |
| MSC Marc | Hexagon (MSC Software) | .dat, .t16, .t19 |
Vendor Lineage and Product Integration History
Is the origin story of each software quite dramatic?
COMSOL Multiphysics
Tell me about "COMSOL Multiphysics"!
Founded in Sweden in 1986. Started as FEMLAB with MATLAB integration, later renamed to COMSOL. Strong in multiphysics.
Current Affiliation: COMSOL AB
Ansys Mechanical (formerly ANSYS Structural)
Tell me about "Ansys Mechanical"!
Developed in 1970 by Swanson Analysis Systems Inc. (SASI). APDL (Ansys Parametric Design Language) based.
Current Affiliation: Ansys Inc.
Abaqus FEA (SIMULIA)
What exactly is Abaqus FEA?
Developed in 1978 by HKS (Hibbitt, Karlsson & Sorensen). Acquired by Dassault Systèmes in 2005 and integrated into the SIMULIA brand.
Current Affiliation: Dassault Systèmes SIMULIA
Ah, I see! So that's how it was, founded in Sweden in that year.
File Formats and Interoperability
Are there any points to note when transferring data between different software?
| Format | Extension | Type | Overview |
|---|---|---|---|
| STEP | .stp/.step | Neutral CAD | 3D CAD data exchange format compliant with ISO 10303. Supports geometry + PMI. |
| IGES | .igs/.iges | Neutral CAD | Early CAD data exchange standard. Has issues with surface data compatibility. Transition to STEP is progressing. |
| MED | .med | Mesh/Results | Developed by EDF/CEA. Used by Code_Aster, etc. HDF5-based. |
When converting models between different solvers, attention is needed regarding the correspondence of element types, compatibility of material models, and differences in the representation of loads/boundary conditions. Especially, higher-order elements and special elements (cohesive elements, user-defined elements, etc.) often cannot be directly converted between solvers.
I see... Formats seem simple at first glance, but they're actually quite deep, aren't they?
Related Topics
なった
詳しく
報告